« AnteriorContinua »
own qualifications. The desire of pleasing has, in different men, produced actions of heroism, and effusions of wit ; but it seems as reasonable to appear the champion as the peet of an "airy nothing," and to quarrel as to write for what Cowley might have learned, from his master Pindar, to call “ the dream of a shadow."
It is surely not difficult, in the solitude of a college, or in the bustle of the world, to find useful studies and serious employment. No man needs to be so burthened with life as to squander it in voluntary dreams of fictitious occurrences. The man that sits down to suppose himself charged with treason or peculation, and heats his mind to an elaborate purgation of his character from crimes which he was never within the possibility of committing, differs only, by the infrequency of his folly, from him who praises beauty which he never saw; complains of jealousy which he never felt; supposes himself sometimes invited, and sometimes forsaken ; fatigues his fancy, and ransacks his memory, for images which may exhibit the gaiety of hope, or the gloominess of despair ; and dresses his imaginary Chloris or Phyllis sometimes in flowers fading as her beauty, and sometimes in gems lasting as her virtues.
At Paris, as secretary to lord Jermyn, he was engaged in transacting things of real importance, with real men and real women, and at that time did not much employ his thoughts upon phantoms of gallantry. Some of his letters to mr. Bennet, afterwards earl of Arlington, from April to December, in 1650, are preserved in“ Miscellanea Aulica," a collection of papers published by Brown. These letters, being written like those of other men, whose minds are more on things than words, contribute no otherwise to his reputation than as they shew him to have been above the affectation of anseasonable elegance, and to have known that the business of a statesman can be little forwarded by lowers of rhetoric.
One passage, however, seenis not unworthy of some notice. Speaking of the Scotch treaty then in agitation,
* The Scotch treaty,” says he, “is the only thing now in which we are vitally concerned; I am one of the last kopers, and yet cannot now abstain from believing that av
agreement will be made; all people upon the place incline to that of union. The Scotch will moderate something of the rigour of their demands; the mutual necessity of an accord is visible; the king is persuaded of it. And to tell you the truth, (which I take to be an argument above all the rest), Virgil has told the same thing to that purpose."
This expression, from a secretary of the present time, would be considered as merely ludicrous, or at most as an ostentatious display of scholarship; but the manners of that time were so tinged with superstition, that I cannot but suspect Cowley of having consulted, on this great occasion, the Virgilian lots, and to have given some credit to the answer of his oracle.
Some years afterwards, “business," says Sprat," passed of course into other hands;" and Cowley, being no longer useful at Paris, was, in 1656, sent back into England, that, “ under pretence of privacy and retirement, he might take occasion of giving notice of the posture of things in this nation."
Soon after his return to London, he was seized by some messengers of the usurping powers, who were sent out in quest of another man; and, being examined, was put into confinement, from which he was not dismissed without the security of a thousand pounds, given by dr. Scarborough.
This year he published his poems, with a preface, in which he seems to have inserted something supp sed in subsequent editions, which was interpreted to denote some relaxation of his loyalty. In this preface he declares, that “his desire had been for some days past, and did still very vehemently continue, to retire himself to some of the American plantations, and to forsake this world for ever.”
From the obloquy, which the appearance of submission to the usurpers brought upon him, his biographer has been very diligent to clear him, and indeed it does not seem to have lessened his reputation. His wish for retirement we can easily believe to be undissembled :-a man harassed in one kingdom, and persecuted in another, who, after a course of business that employed all his days and half his nights, in cyphering and decyphering, comes to his own country, and steps into a prison, will be willing enough to retire to some place of quiet and of safety. Yet, let neither our reverence for a genius, nor our pity for a sufferer, dispose us to forget, that, if his activity was virtue, his retreat was cowardice.
He then took upon himself the character of physician; still, according to Sprat, with intention “to dissemble the main design of his coming over;" and, as mr. Wood relates, “complying with the men then in power, (which was much taken notice of by the royal party), he obtained an ordet to be created doctor of physic; which being done to his mind, (whereby he gained the ill-will of some of his friends), he went into France again, having made a copy of verses on Oliver's death."
This is no favourable representation; yet, even in this, not much wrong can be discovered. How far he complied with the men in power, is to be inquired, before he can be blamed. It is not said that he told them any secrets, or assisted them by intelligence, or any other act. If he only promised to be quiet, that they in whose hands he was might free him from confinement, he did what no law of society prohibits.
The man, whose miscarriage in a just cause has put him in the power of his enemy, may, without any violation of his integrity, regain his liberty, or preserve his life, by a promise of neutrality: for, the stipulation gives the enemy nothing which he had not before: the neutrality of a captive may be always secured by his imprisonment or death. He that is at the disposal of another may not promise to aid him in any injurious act, because no power can compel active obedience. He may engage to do nothing, but not to do ill.
There is reason to think that Cowley promised little. It does not appear that his compliance gained him confidence enough to be trusted without security, for the bond of his bail was never cancelled; nor that it made him think himself secure; for, at that dissolution of government which followed the death of Oliver, he returned into France, where he resumed his former station, and staid till the restoration,
“ He continued,” says his biographer, “under these bonds till the general deliverance.” It is therefore to be supposed, that he did not go to France, and act again for the king, without the consent of his bondsman; that he did not shew his loyalty at the hazard of his friend, but by his friend's permission.
Of the verses on Oliver's death, in which Wood's narrative seems to imply something encomiastic, there has been no appearance. There is a discourse concerning his govern. ment, indeed, with verses intermixed, but such as certainly gainod its author no friends among the abettors of usurpation.
A doctor of physic, however, he was made, at Oxford, in December 1657; and, in the commencement of the royal society, of which an account has been given by dr. Birch, he appears busy among the experimental philosophers, with the title of dr. Cowley.
There is no reason for supposing that he ever attempted practice: but his preparatory studies have contributed something to the honour of his country. Considering botany as necessary to a physician, he retired into Kent to gather plants; and, as the predominance of a favourite study affects all subordinate operations of the intellect, botany, in the mind of Cowley, turned into poetry. He composed, in Latin, several books on plants; of which the first and second display the qualities of herbs, in elegiac verse; the third and fourth, the beauties of flowers, in various measures; and the fifth and sixth, the uses of trees, in heroic numbers.
At the same time were produced, from the same university, the two great poets, Cowley and Milton, of dissimilar genius, of opposite principles; but concurring in the cultivation of Latin poetry, in which the English, till their works and May's poem appeared, seemed unable to contest the palm with any other of the lettered nations.
If the Latin performances of Cowley and Milton be compared, (for May I hold to be superior to both), the advantage seems to lie on the side of Cowley. Milton is generally content to express the thoughts of the ancients in their language; Cowley, without much loss of purity or elegance, accommodates the diclion of Rome to his own conceptions,
At the restoration, after all the diligence of his long sersice, and with consciousness, not only of the merit of fidelity, but of the dignity of great abilities, he naturally expected ample preferments; and, that he might not be forgotten by his own fault, wrote a song of triumph. But this was a time of such general hope, that great numbers were inevitably disappointed; and Cowley found his reward very tediously delayed. He had been promised, by both Charles the first and second, the mastership of the Savoy; “but he lost it,” says Wood,“ by certain persons, enemies to the muses."
The neglect of the court was not his only mortification: -having, by such alteration as he thought proper, fitted his old comedy of “ The Guardian” for the stage, he produced it under the title of “The Cutter of Coleman-street." It was treated on the stage with great severity, and was afterwards censured as a satire on the king's party.
Mi. Dryden, who went with mr. Sprat to the first exhibition, related to mr. Dennis, “ that when they told Cowley how little favour had been shewn him, he received the news of his ill success not with so much firmness as might have been expected from so great a man.”
What firmness they expected, or what weakness Cowley discovered, cannot be known. He that misses his end will never be as much pleased as he that attains it, even when he can impute no part of his failure to himself; and when the end is to please the multitude, no man perhaps has a right, in things admitting of gradation and comparison, to throw the whole blame upon his judges, and totally to exclude diffidence and shame, by a haughty consciousness of his own excellence.
For the rejection of this play it is difficult now to find the reason: it certainly has, in a very great degree, the power of fixing attention and exciting merriment. From the charge of disaffection he exculpates himself in his preface, by observing how unlikely it is, that, having followed the royal family through all their distresses," he should chuse the time of their restoration to begin a quarrel with them.” It appears, however, from the theatrical register of Downes,