Stuart v. Greenall, 1988 Stubbing, Tennant v. 1438 Stump v. Ayliffe, 536 Suckerman and Cotes v. Warner, 272 Sweet, Baker and others v. 629 T Talbot v. Salmon, 764 Talmy, Medley v. 559. 765 Taswell v. Athill, 537 Tate v. Skelton, 1503 Crayhorne v. 650 v. Cunliffe, 1763 Drake v. 863 Manby v. 1814. 1997 Meadhouse v. 329 v. Walker, 699 Webber v. 656 v. Wymond, 1576 Tennant v. Stubbing, 1438 Terry, Stockwell v. 823. 907 Thackston, Ingram v. 819 Thetford, Browne v. 431 Thomas v. Price, 871. 1257 v. Rees, 796 Thompson v. Holt, 671 Thompson v. Williamson, 1978 Thorn, Nash v. 1324 Townley v. Tomlinson, 1004. 1017 v. Wilson and St. Bride's, 635 Trappes, Hallewell v. 1639 v. Oxton, 1066. 1293 Trelawney, Glanvil v. 622 Serjeant v. 662 Trenchard and others, Bishop of Exe. ter v. 626 Trepass, Bennett v. 633 Trinity College, Chaytor v. 1459 Vicar of Kellington v. 799 Trott, Benton v. 194. 208. 288 Watson, Mason v. 611 Moncaster v. 905. v. Paternoster, 1611 Webb v. Warner, 226 Weedon and others, Turner v. 524 Westminster, Dean and Chapter of, and Whitaker and Tiddersdale v. Dr. Ley Willoughby de Broke, Lord, Atkins v. 1412 Kynaston v. 892 Wilshaw, Walklate v. 1504 Wilson v. Bishop of Carlisle, 279. 588 v. Mason, 974 Townley and St. Bride's v. 635 Wimberley, Fish v. 533 Winchcombe, Sherwood v. 164. 177 Windham v. Norris, 136 Chaytor v. 1459 Woodeson, Hicks v. 550 Woodford v. Standfast, 534 Woodnoth v. Lord Cobham, 653 v. Miller, 1436 Worral v. Miller, 1623 v. Nichols, 1302 Wortley, Goodwin v. et e contra, 715 ACTS AND RECORDS OF PARLIAMENT RELATING TO TITHES, &c. &c. The Statute of Circumspectè Agatis, made 13 E. I. and Certain Cases wherein the King's Prohibition doth not lie. THE king to his justices, greeting: -- Use yourselves circumspectly in all matters concerning the bishop of Norwich and his clergy, not punishing them if they hold pleas in court christian of such things as are merely spiritual; (to wit), If a parson demand tithes, greater or smaller, so that the fourth part of the value of the benefice be not demanded. Item, If a parson demand mortuaries in places where a mortuary hath been used to be given. In these cases the ecclesiastical judge hath cognizance, notwithstanding the king's prohibition. The lord the king answered to these articles, that in tithes, obventions, oblations, mortuaries, when the question is as aforesaid, there is no room for a prohibition. But, if a clerk or religious person shall sell his tithes to any one for money after they are gathered into his barn or any where else, and plea be holden thereof in the spiritual court, the king's prohibition hath place; because by the sale the things spiritual become temporal, and so the tithes pass into chattels. Item, If debate arise upon the right of tithes having its origin in the right of patronage, and the quantity of those tithes exceed the fourth part of the benefice, the king's prohibition hath place. A.D. 1315. Stat. 9 E. II. (Articuli Cleri), c. 1. No Prohibition shall be granted where Tithes are demanded, but where Money is paid for them. FIRST, Whereas laymen purchase prohibitions generally, upon tithes, obventions, oblations, mortuaries, redemption of penance, VOL. I. B 1285. [2] |