collect the manuscripts which I have been favoured with, as they lay in many hands. The communications were not always obtained with equal facility. My applications were sometimes silenced by the deep tones of business, and sometimes waved by the civil apologies of gentlemanly indolence. I had sometimes to hear from clerks that their masters were inaccessible, except to clients ; I had sometimes to excuse myself for intruding upon men who had nothing to do. It is, surely, not to be wondered at, if I was occasionally disconcerted; if languor succeeded to disappointment, and I became indifferent to a work, about the prosecution of which the world shewed no concern. But this was not the only cause which contributed to check its progress. It seemed to little purpose to state and discuss the law, when the subject-matter itself was . threatened with annihilation; when men were industriously taught to believe that agriculture would derive vigour from the abolition of Tithes, and the state would find resources in their ruins. A bold financial policy, favoured by the indifferency of a great part of mankind to every thing connected with religion, and supported by the zeal of sectarism, the wiles of interest, and the prejudices of ignorance at the view of such a combination acting at a most alarming juncture, amidst the distresses of war and of scarcity, I will confess, I have often thrown down my pen, and desisted from the pursuit of an inquiry which seemed to be fruitless. HENRY GWILLIM. Portsea, March 2, 1801. T A B L E TO [Those Cases printed in Italics are additional.] The Figures refer to the Pages. А Arundel's, Lord, Case, 620 Adams v. Waller, e contra, 1204 Taswell v. 537 Atkins v. Hatton, Bart. 1406 v. Lord Willoughby de Broke, 1412 Lord Stawell v. 1434 Atkinson v. Folkes, 1376 Attorney General and Blair v. Cholm- Attorney General v. Lord Eardley, 1943. Attorney General, Parry and Gibbs v. All Saints Parishioners of, Owen, v. Austen, Grene v. 226 Anonymous, 118. 133. 156. 165, 166. Ayd v. Flower, 613 Fox v. 697 Ayliffe, Stump v. 536 Antrobus v. The East India Company, Aynsley v. Wordsworth, 1709 Armstrong v. Hewitt, 1831 Baber, Scory v. 163 Backhurst, Russel v. 551 Bagnail v. Stokes, 170 Bagot, Lord, Delves v. 1271 Croft v. 1325 Worrall, 632 Baker v. Athill, 1423 v. Cocker, 385. 785 and others, Langham v.511 v. Planner, 631 Strutt v. 1430 v. Sweet, 629 Bacon, Barker v. 226 Bakewell, Oliver v. 1381 Baldwin, Broadhurst v. 1810 Bale v. Hodgetts, 2060 Ball and others, Carte v. 797 Grant v. 515 Balser, Green v. 189 Banister v. Wright, 501 Banks, Parry v. 353 Bardwel, Fox v. et e contra, 716 Barfoot v. Norton, 501 Barham v. Goose, 1539 Barker, Coleman v. 665 Barker v. Bacon, 226 v. Baker, 1695 Barkley v. Walters, 1469 Barksdale, Blincoe v. 197 Barlow, Brown v. 1001 Chapman v. 657 Barnard, Garnons v. 1462 Barnes, Hutton v. 225. 285 Baron, Williams v. 931 Barrett, Jones v. 657 Barroby, Robinson v. 1173 Barrow, Bond v. 1494 Barsdale v. Smith, 207 Barton v. Hollis, 1613 Baskerville v. Clarke, 1567 Batchellor v. Smallcombe, 1864 Batchelor, Umfreville v. 548 Bate v. Hodges, 645 v. Sprakling, 618 Bateman v. Aistroppe, 1048 Bathurst, Porter v. 132. 373 Bawde, Waterhouse, Lady v 227 Bawdrie v. Bushel, 681. 683 Beadle v. Sherman, 206 Beal v. Web, 220 Beale, Rumney v. 1861 Bean v. Lee, 609 Beard, Beadle v. 332 - Chapman v. 1482 Beardmore v. Gilbert, 649 v. Shilcot, 944 Beaver v. Spratley, 739 Bennet, Parry and Gibbs v. 1490 v. Trepass, 633 Biggs v. Martin and Letts, 542. 834 Bishop v. Arundell, 585 v. Chichester, 1316 d. Langlands, 1368 Blair and Attorney General v. Cholmley, Blake, Croft v. 530 v. Veysie, 1736 Bosworth v. Limbrick, Cullimore, and Buckden, Parson of, Bishop of Win- Botolph, St. (Parson of) Case, 434 Buckhurst v. Newnton, 838 Bucklea, Bishop of Norwich, and v. Wright, 658 Eachạrd v. 610 Buffkeen, Green v. 197 Bullen v. Michel, 1779 Bullen, Michel, v. 1788 Bowman, Lygon v. 1374 Burbage, Burslem v. 1324 Burfey and another, $. G. Shirley v. Boyer's Case, 374 Burgess Dr. v. Symons, 433 Burnell v. Jenkins, 1792 Burrell, Dunn v. 299. 643 Burslem v. Burbage, 1324 Earl of Coventry v. 1596 -, Spencer, et e contra, 746 Burt, Gumley v. 656 Brassier, Steers v. 742 Bury St. Edmund's Corporation and Brazen Nose College, Twiss v. 514 Wright v. Evans, 757 Breary v. Manby, 904 Bushel, Bawdrie v. 683 Butcher, Margetts v. 531 Brewster, Erskine v. 961 v. Howard, 2030 Bridgewater Duke of, Bishop of Here- Button, Filewood v. 1424 Briggs, Morton v. 561 Buxton v. Hutchison, 535 Byam v. Booth, 1744 Byne v. Dodderidge, 578 v. Donnesthorpe, 1396 с Cage v. Warner and another, 513 Brock, Pyke v. 1945 Caldwall, Glass v. 1030 Caley v. Williamson, 1123 Calland, Rose v. 1620 Calmady v. Ryder, 265 Calmell, Chave v. 926 v. Sherratt and Muchell, 1171 Brooksley v. Watts, 1743 Canning qui tam, &c. v. Jones, 364 &c. v. Newman, 365 Cannon, Grant v. 541 Clarke v. Jennings, 1424 Canterbury's, Archbishop of, Case, 189 Kynaston v. 960 Carlisle, Bishop of, Wilson v. 279. 588 Lord Mansfield v. 949 Carleton v. Brightwell, 676 Nanton v. 609 Carpenter, Gale v. 945 Norton v. 428 Carr v. Chamberlayne, Heaton, and Ord v. 1437 Chapman, 1258 Clarke v. Porter, 1800 Sir Thomas Fowke, Heaton, Peat, Clarke, Potts v. 1351 and Chamberlayne v. 1258 v. Stapler, 926 Cart v. Hodgkin, 815 Clavill v. Oram, 1354 Cleeves v. Knyfton, 1048 Clerke, Dean and Chapter of Bristol, v. Carthew v. Edwards, 826. 1114 119 Cartwright v. Bailey, 938 Cleypole, Marston v. 674 Chaloner, Travis v. 1237 Clifton, Bradshaw w 1014 v. Orchard, 746 Cobb v. Selby, 1644 Cobham Lord, Woodnoth v. 653 Chambers, Berney v. 673, 674 Cocker, Baker v. 385. 785 - v. Hanbury, 208. 212 Cocket, Hunston v. 235 Champernon v. Hill, 225 Codrington and others, Hunt v. 564 Chandler, Bliss v. 625 Coe v. Mason, 506 Chaplin, Bree v. 1033 v. Smith, 577 Chapman v. Barlow, 657 Coggan v. Lord Lonsdale, 1404 v. Beard, 1482 Cokburne v. Hughes, 1810 Colchester v. Russell, 741 Cole, Peacock v. 751 Colegrave v. Hackey, 783 Chapman v. Pilcher, 1653 Coleman v. Barker, 665 Chapman v. Patching, 592 Collard v. Newton, 530 v. Smith, 847 v. Northleigh, 835 Charlton, Lady, v. Sir Blunden Charlo Colley, Jordan v. 625 ton, 715 Collins, Croucher v. 1576 Charry v. Garland, 951 v. Gough, 1294 Chatfield v. Fryer, 1724 Sawrey v. 1181 Chave v. Calmel, 926 v. Vaughan, 161. Chaworth's Case, 177 Collins, Warwick v. 1716. 1720 Chaytor v. Trinity College and Wood, Collyer v. Howes, 1489 1459 Compost v. Howes, 514 Cheeseman v. Hoby, 862 Conant v. Greaves, Bart. 523 Chichester, Bishop v. 1316 Congley v. Hall, 372 Chichester v. Sheldon, 2072 Cook v. Butt, 2029 Child, Wintall v. 698 v. Derby, 827 Chitty v. Reeve, 1558 Taylor v. 1971 Cholmley, Attorney General and Blair, Heaton v. 1666 0.914 Cooke, O'Connor v. 1624 Christian, Laithes v. 740 v. Southby, 430 v. Wrenn, Ib. Cooper v. Lady Gresham, 170 Churley, Pettit v. 536 Wickham Bishop of Lincoln v. Claget, Saunderson v. 885 163. 176 Clanrickard, Earl of, v. Lady Denton, Foreman v. 2071 360 v. Thorpe, 1883 Clarke's Case, 178 Core, Young v. 198 Clarke, Baskerville v. 1567 Coppard v. Page, 1621 Clarke, Gouge v. 670. Cornwall, Hawes v. 833 |