Why Lawyers Derail Justice: Probing the Roots of Legal InjusticesPenn State Press, 1 de nov. 2010 |
Continguts
The Split Between Legal Language and Common Sense | 5 |
Injustices Arising from Formalism and Impartiality | 16 |
Legalistic Morality | 25 |
Dworkins Interpretative Community | 31 |
1 | 76 |
4 | 84 |
Kants Moral Foundations and Legalism | 93 |
Altres edicions - Mostra-ho tot
Why Lawyers Derail Justice: Probing the Roots of Legal Injustices John Charles Anderson Visualització de fragments - 1999 |
Why Lawyers Derail Justice: Probing the Roots of Legal Injustices John C. Anderson Previsualització no disponible - 2004 |
Why Lawyers Derail Justice: Probing the Roots of Legal Injustices John Charles Anderson Previsualització no disponible - 1999 |
Frases i termes més freqüents
Accordingly action adjudication applied argue argument arises Aristotelian Aristotle Aristotle's notion artificial association categorical imperative chapter circumstances citizens coercion community of principle concern contemporary contract crime criminal criticism custom discretion distinction Dworkin Dworkin's notion egalitarian emphasizes equality ethical example fact framework friendship grounding H. L. A. Hart Hart human Ibid impartiality individual injustices involves judges jurisprudence jurisprudential jury Kant Kant's kingdom of ends Law's Empire lawyers legal interpretation legal justice legal rules legal system legalist fallacy legislative legitimacy limited merely metaphysical morally neutral murderer natural communities natural justice natural law natural political community notion of epieikeia notion of equity notion of justice notion of natural officials one's particular person positive law positivists problem procedural due process question rational recognize reforms result role Ronald Dworkin sense so-called social society statute teleological Terminiello theory tion ultimately universalizability University Press unjust virtue Wall Street Journal Washington Post