Temple University Press, 3 de maig 2010 - 288 pàgines
In this innovative study, William Vitek presents the act of promising as both a fundamental human experience and an ethically charged paradox in need of explanation and understanding. He evaluates contemporary approaches to promise by such philosophers as John Rawls, John Searle, Henry Sidgwick, Jan Narveson, P.S. Atiyah, H.A. Prichard, W.D. Ross, and Michael Robins. Citing their limited focus on promissory obligation, Vitek claims that promising should be seen as a complex social practice. The author demonstrates how a social practice account of promising succeeds where other approaches do not. With engaging examples of promises made in everyday life, in extraordinary circumstances, and in literary works, Vitek grapples with the central paradox of promising: that human beings can intend a future to which they are largely blind. Although the nature of promises has been much discussed in the context of other topics (e.g., theories of language, ethics, and law), this book offers a unique, focused treatment of the subject as a complex human activity that encompasses differing interpretations and changes in nature over time. Promising explores this activity that involves the use of intuition, judgment, and emotion and that has challenged people throughout history.
Què opinen els usuaris - Escriviu una ressenya
No hem trobat cap ressenya als llocs habituals.
able accept actions activity approach approach to promise argues arise Atiyah become behavior believe calls Chapter character chess claims clear commitment complex conception consider constitutive rules contemporary create define depends describe discussion duty engage Ethics evaluation example exceptions excusing exist expectations experience explain expressed fact fail follow formulations function future give human Hume imagine imitation important institution intention interest interpretations intuitions judge judgment keep language meaning mind models moral nature necessary obligation observe occurs one's original Oxford participate person philosophical play position possible prac practice approach practice of promise practice roles practitioners problem proficient prom promisor promissory question raised Rawls reasons recognize refer rely requires Searle share similar social specific suggests tell theory of promise tions understand University Press wants