genuine remains of Patriarchal institutions and customs, to which, indeed, other institutions required by the existing circumstances of the Israelites were annexed. The second is an inquiry into the nature and object of these, and into the effect which the study and practice of 赛 them may have had on the subsequent writings and genius of the nation. From this cursory examination of the Mosaic Law the third Sermon enters into a comparison of the Patriarchal and Levitical priesthoods, selecting for the former that of Melchisedek, whose office and individual character are elicited, as far as possible, from the Scriptures and other records of antiquity. In the fourth, the history of the Baptist, as the herald of the new covenant, is inves→ tigated; and the difference which subsisted between his baptism and that long before insuse among the Jews, and between his ministry and that of our Saviour is discussed.com The fifth exclusively relates to some particulars connected with the Messiah's nativity and Mission, and to the superiority of his economy over the preceding. ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE, Nov. 6, 1826. CONTENTS. SERMON I. ON THE EVIDENCES, THAT THE LAW OF MOSES WAS NOT BORROWED FROM THE EGYPTIANS, AND THAT IT WAS A DIVINE REVELATION. 1 THESS. V. 21. Prove all things, hold fast that which is good.... SERMON II. PAGE 1 ON THE PROOFS THAT THE LAW HAD A RELATION TO CHRISTIANITY, AND WAS PARTIALLY ELUCIDATED BY THE PROPHETS. MATT. v. 17. Think not that I am come to destroy the Law and the Prophets :-I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil 39 SERMON III. ON THE OFFICE OF MELCHISEDEK. HEB. v. 10, part of 11. Called of God an High Priest after the order of Melchisedek, of whom we have many things to say, and hard to be uttered 71 |