MILBOURNE (Luke) A Short Defence of the Orders of the Church of England as by Law established. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 16.] A Plain Answer to a Popish Priest questioning the Orders of the Church of England. [By Abednego SELLER.] 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 3.] A Defence of the Ordinations and Ministry of the Church of England. [By- WHITFIELD.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 20. 2.] The Validity of the Orders of the Church of England made out against the Objections of the Papists, in several Letters to a Gentleman of Norwich, that desired satisfaction therein. [By Dr. Humphry PRIDEAUX]. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 3.] Roman Catholics Uncertain whether there be any true Priests or Sacraments in the Church of Rome. [By Thomas MARSDEN.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 20. 2.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. s. 3.] COURAYER (Pierre François) Dissertation sur la Validité des Ordinations des Anglois, et sur la Succession des Evesques de l'Eglise Anglicane. Avec les Preuves des faits avancez dans cet ouvrage. 8vo. 2 parties. Bruxelles, 1723. [M. 8. 1,2.] Hardouin (Père) La Dissertation de P. Le Courayer sur la Succession des Evesques Anglois refutée. 8vo. Paris, 1724. [M. 8. 3.] Défense de la Dissertation sur la Validité des Ordinations des Anglois contre les differentes Responses qui y ont été faites. Par l'Auteur de la Dissertation. 8vo. 2 tomes en 4 vols. Bruxelles, 1726. [M. 8. 4-7.] BROWNE (Thomas) The Story of the Ordination of our First Bishops in Queen Elizabeth's Reign, at the Nag's Head Tavern, examined; and proved to be an absurd Fable. 8vo. London, 1731. [N. 7. 42.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1731. [R. 12. 76.] (2) VINDICATIONS OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND FROM THE ROMANISTS' CHARGE OF SCHISM AND HERESY. HAMMOND (Henry) Of Schisme. A Defence of the Church of England against the Exceptions of the Romanists. 12mo. London, 1654. [M. 18. 20.] A Reply to the Catholick Gentleman's Answer to the most material. Parts of the Booke of Schisme. 4to. London, 1654. [M. 20. 34.] TWISDEN (Sir Roger) An Historical Vindication of the Church of England, in point of Schism, as it stands separated from the Roman, and was reformed 1o Elizabeth. 4to. London, 1675. [E. 20. 3.] A LETTER, wherein is shewed, 1. What Worship is due to Images according to the Council of Nice; and 2. That the Papists are very unjust in charging Schism on the Church of England. 4to. London, 1680. [M. 20. 14.] A Vindication of the Church of England from the foul Aspersions of Schism and Heresie, unjustly cast upon her by the Church of Rome. [By Michael ALTHAM.] In 2 parts. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 21,25.] An Answer to a late printed Paper, given about by some of the Church of Rome. [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 21.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 5.] A Protestant of the Church of England no Donatist: or Some Short Notes on Lucilla and Elizabeth. [By Dr. Wm. SHERLOCK.] 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 3.] An Apologetical Vindication of the Church of England: in Answer to those who reproach her with the English Heresies and Schisms, or suspect her not to be a Catholic Church upon their account. [By Dr. George HICKES.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 21.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8.3.] The Schism of the Church of England demonstrated in four Arguments. 4to. Oron. 1688. [M. 20. 2.] The Reformation of the Church of England justified, according to the Canons of the Council of Nice and other General Councils, and the Tradition of the Catholic Church; being an Answer to "The Schism of the Church of England demonstrated." [By Dr. W. SAYWELL.] 4to. Cambridge, 1688. [N. 8. 3.] (3.) VINDICATIONS OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND FROM THE POPISH CHARGE OF SYMBOLIZING WITH THE CHURCH OF ROME. A Short and True Account of the several Advances the Church of England hath made towards Rome: or, A Model of the ground upon which the Papists for these Hundred Years have built their hopes and expectations, that England would ere long return to Popery. [By Peter Du MOULIN.] 4to. London, 1680. [M. 14. 30.] An Agreement with the Church of England and the Church of Rome evinced from the Concertation of some of her Sons with their Brethren the Dissenters. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 19.] A Vindication of some Protestant Principles of Church Unity and Catholic Communion, from the charge of Agreement with the Church of Rome. [By Dr. Wm. SHERLOCK.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 19.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 5.] The Difference between the Church of England and the Church of Rome. In opposition to a late Book, intituled "An Agreement between the Church of England and Church of Rome." [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 4.] (4.) OF THE ROYAL PAPERS (VIZ. TWO OF KING CHARLES II. AND ONE OF THE DUCHESS OF YORK), AND OF THE DISCOURSES OCCASIONED BY THEM. Copies of Two Papers written by the late King Charles II. Together with the Copy of a Paper written by the late Duchess of York. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 20.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 3.] A Short and Plain Way to the Faith of the Church by that eminent divine Mr. Richard HUDLESTON, of the Congregation of S. Benedict. To which ure annexed his late Majesty's King Charles II. Papers found in his Closet after his decease; as also a Brief Account of what occurred on his Death-bed in regard to Religion. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 17.] Q An Answer to some Papers lately printed, concerning the Authority of the Catholic Church in matters of Faith, and the Reformation of the Church of England. [By Dr. Edward STILLINGFLEET.] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 20.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 3.] A Defence of the Papers written by the late King of blessed memory, and Duchess of York, against the Answer made to them. [By John DRYDEN.] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 20.] A Reply to the Answer made upon the Three Royal Papers. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 20.] A Vindication of the Answer to some late Papers concerning the Unity and Authority of the Catholick Church and the Reformation of the Church of England. [By Dr. Edward STILLINGFLEET.] 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 3.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 20.] (5.) POPISH DISCOURSES, WRITTEN BY WAY OF Advice to the PROTESTANT PULPITS, WITH THE REPLIES BY Divines of the CHURCH OF England. Good Advice to the Pulpits; delivered in a few Cautions, for keeping up the Reputation of those Chairs and preserving the Nation in Peace. Published with Allowance. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 17.] An Apology for the Pulpits: being an Answer to "Good Advice to the Pulpits." [By John WILLIAMS.] Together with an Appendix, containing a Defence of Dr. Tennison's Sermon about Alms, [by Dr. Tennison] in a Letter to the Author of this Apology. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 17.] : Pulpit-Sayings or the Characters of the Pulpit-Papist examined: in Answer to the " Apology for the Pulpits," and in Vindication of the Representer against the Stater of the Controversie. With Allowance. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 14. 29.] Pulpit Popery, true Popery: in Defence of the "Apology," and in Answer to "Pulpit Sayings." [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 14. 29.] (6.) DISCOURSES WRITTEN DURing the RepreSENTING CONTROVERSY, IN THE REIGN OF KING JAMES II. A Papist Mis-represented and Represented: or a Twofold Character of Popery. The one containing a Sum of the Superstitions, Idolatries, Cruelties, Treacheries and Wicked Principles of that Popery, which hath disturbed this Nation above an hundred and fifty years; filled it with fears and jealousies, and deserves the hatred of all Good Christians. The other laying open that Popery, which the Papists own and profess, with the chief Articles of their Faith, and some of the principal Grounds and Reasons which hold them in that Religion. 4to. London, 1665. [M. 14. 25.] Another Copy. To which are annexed Roman Catholick Principles in reference to God and the King. 4to. London, 1685. [N. 8. 2.] The Doctrines and Practices of the Church of Rome truly represented, in Answer to a late Book intituled "A Papist Misrepresented and Represented." [By Dr. STILLINGFLEET.] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 25.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 1.] Reflections upon the Answer to the "Papist Misrepresented," &c. directed to the Answerer. 4to. n. d. [N. 8. 2.] Another Copy. [M. 14. 25.] A Papist not misrepresented by Protestants, being a Reply to the Reflections upon the Answer to the "Papist Misrepresented," &c. [By Dr. SHERLOCK] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 25.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 1.] Remarks upon the Reflections of the Author of " Popery Misrepresented," &c. on his Answerer, particularly as to the Deposing Doctrine. [By Abednego SELLER.] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 20.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 2.] Papists Protesting against Protestant Popery, being a Vindication of the "Papist Mis-represented and Represented," and the Reflections upon the Answer. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 20.] An Answer to a Discourse intituled "Papists protesting against Protestant Popery;" being a Vindication of "Papists not misrepresented by Protestants;" and containing a particular Examination of Monsieur de Meaux his Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of Rome in the Articles of Invocation of Saints and the Worship of Images, occasioned by that Discourse. [By William SHERLOCK.] 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 1.] An Amicable Accommodation of the Difference between the Representer and the Answerer, in return to his last Reply against the Papist protesting against Protestant Popery. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 20.] An Answer to the Amicable Accommodation. [By Dr. SHERLOCK.] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 20.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 1.] A Reply to the Answer of the Amicable Accommodation. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 20.] A View of the whole Controversy between the Representer and the Answerer; with an Answer to the Representer's last Reply. [By Dr. Wm. CLAGETT.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 25.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 1.] An Answer to the Representer's Reflections upon the State and View of the Controversy: with a Reply to the Vindicator's full Answer. [By William CLAGETT.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 17.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 2.] A Catechism truly representing the Doctrines and Practices of the Church of Rome, with an Answer thereunto. [By John WILLIAMS.] 8vo. London, 1686. [N. 9. 43.] The Catholic Representer: or the Papist Misrepresented and Represented. Part II. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 20.] The Papist Represented and not Misrepresented; being an Answer to the first sheet of the Second Part of the " Papist Misrepresented and Represented." [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 9.] . The Papist Represented, and not Misrepresented in Answer to the Second Sheet of the Second Part of the " Papist Misrepresented and Represented." [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 20.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 9.] Transubstantiation no Doctrine of the Primitive Fathers; being a Defence of the Dublin Letter herein against the "Papist Misrepresented and Represented, Part II." Cap. 3. [By John PATRICK.] London, 1687. [M. 14. 20.] 4to. Wholesome Advices from the Virgin Mary to her indiscreet Worshippers. Translated from the French, with a Preface. [By James TAYLOR.] 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 9.] A Letter to the Misrepresenter of Papists; in Answer to the Fourth Chapter of the Second Part of the Papist Misrepresented, &c. [By James TAYLOR.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 20.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 9.] The Papist Represented and not Misrepresented, being an Answer to the Fifth and Sixth Chapters of the Second Part of the Papist Misrepresented and Represented. [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1687. The People's Right to read the Holy Scripture asserted. the 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th Chapters of the Second Popish Representer. [By Dr. Nicholas STRATFORD.] 1687. [M. 15. 3.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 6.] [M. 14. 20.] In Answer to Part of the 4to. London, (7.) DISCOURSES OCCASIONED BY THE EXPOUNDING Controversy DURING THE REIGN OF KING JAMES II. BOSSUET (James Benigne, Bishop of Meaux) An Exposition of the Doctrine of the Catholic Church in Matters of Controversie. 8vo. London, 1686. [K. 15. 37.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 19.] Another Copy. 12mo. London, 1753. [Ff. 8. 72.] Bossuet (Jacobi Benigni, Episcopi Condomensis) Doctrine Catholicæ, de üs Argumentis de quibus Controversiae sunt, Expositio; ex interpretatione Claudii Fleurii. 18mo. Antverpiæ, 1678. [H. 17. 27.] An Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of England in the several Articles proposed by Monsieur de Meaux, in his Exposition of the Doctrine of the Catholic Church; to which is prefixed, a particular Account of Monsieur de Meaux's Book. [By Wm. WAKE.] 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 1.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 25.] A Vindication of the Bishop of Condom's Exposition of the Doctrine of the Catholic Church, in Answer to "An Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of England," &c. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 25.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1686. [N. 8. 1.] A Pastoral Letter from the Lord Bishop of Meaux to the New Catholics of his Diocess, exhorting them to keep their Easter, and giving them necessary advertisements against the false Pastoral Letters of their Ministers. With Reflections upon the pretended Persecution. Translated out of French. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 25.] The Answer of the New Converts of France to a Pastoral Letter from u Protestant Minister. Done out of French. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 21.] |