HILL (Samuel) The Harmony of the Canonical and Apocryphal Scriptures with the Catholic Tradition of Faith in the Trinity in Unity, and the Incarnation of the Eternal Word and Son of God. 8vo. London, 1713. [M. 19. 12.] KNIGHT (James) The Scripture Doctrine of the Most Holy and Undivided Trinity, vindicated from the Misinterpretations of Dr. Clarke. don, 1714. [M. 20. 28.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1714. [N. 9. 2.] [R. 11. 66.] 8vo. Lon Clarke (Samuel) A Reply to the Objections of Robert Nelson, Esq. and of an anonymous Author against Dr. Clarke's Scripture Doctrine of the Trinity to which is added, an Answer to the Remarks of the Author of Some Considerations concerning the Trinity, and the Ways of managing that Controversy. 8vo. London, 1714. [N. 9. 8.] Edwards (John) Some Brief Remarks on Dr. Clarke's Reply to Mr. Nelson, &c. 8vo. London, 1714. [M. 16. 29.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1714. [P. 276. (4.)] Potter (Edward) A Vindication of our Blessed Saviour's Divinity, chiefly against Dr. Clarke. 8vo. Cambridge, 1714. [I. 14. 31.] Welchman (Edward) Dr. Clarke's Scripture Doctrine of the Trinity examined. 8vo. London, 1714. [M. 9. 6.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1714. [N. 9. 2.] Whitby (Daniel) A Discourse, shewing that the Exposition which the AnteNicene Fathers have given of the Texts alleged against the Rev. Dr. Clarke by a Learned Layman, are more agreeable to the Interpretations of Dr. Clarke than to the Interpretations of that Learned Layman. 8vo. London, 1714. [M. 19. 13.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1714. [P. 57. (2.)] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1714. [N. 9. 8.] Whitby (Daniel) A Dissuasive from enquiring into the Doctrine of the Trinity; or the Difficulties and Discouragements which attend the Study of that Doctrine. 8vo. London, 1714. [M. 19. 6.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1714. [P. 57. (3.)] Three Letters to Dr. Clarke concerning his "Scripture Doctrine of the Trinity," with the Doctor's Reply. 8vo. London, 1714. [M. 19. 6.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1714. [N. 9. 8.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1714. [P. 130. (1.)] Reflections upon the present Controversie concerning the Holy Trinity. 8vo. London, 1714. [M. 19. 6.] Mayo (—) A Plain Scripture Argument against Dr. Clarke's Doctrine concerning the ever-blessed Trinity. 8vo. London, 1715. [N. 9. 20.] --Another Copy. Svo. London, 1715. [P. 139. 3.] Nye (Stephen) An Explication of the Articles of the Unity, Trinity, and Incarnation. Svo. London, 1715. [N. 9. 19.] 8vo. Lon JACKSON (John) An Examination of Mr. Nye's Explication of the Articles of the Divine Unity, the Trinity, and Incarnation. don, 1715. [M. 20. 24.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1715. [R. 8. 57.] 250 Jackson (John) A Collection of Queries; wherein the most material Objections which have as yet been alledged against Dr. Clarke's Scripture Doctrine of the Trinity are proposed and answered. 8vo. London, 1716. [N. 9. 15.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1716. [R. 8. 57.] BENNET (Thomas) A Discourse of the ever-blessed Trinity in Unity, with an Examination of Dr. Clarke's Scripture Doctrine of the Trinity. 8vo. London, 1718. [R. 10. 22.] FOWLER (Edward) Certain Propositions by which the Doctrine of the Trinity is so explained according to the Ancient Fathers, as to speak it not contradictory to Natural Reason. 8vo. London, 1719. [P. 130. (5.)] The Bishop of London's Letter to his Clergy defended; wherein the constant Worship of Son and Holy Spirit, with the Father, during the first ages, is set forth. 8vo. London, 1719. [R. 19. 22.] Clarke (Samuel) A Modest Plea for the Baptismal and Scripture Notion of the Trinity. 8vo. London, 1719. [R. 9. 64.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1720. [N. 9. 15.] The Modest Plea continued: or a Brief and Distinct Answer to Dr. Waterland's Queries relating to, the Doctrine of the Trinity. 8vo. London, 1720. [N. 9. 15.] Smalbroke (Richard) Idolatry charged upon Arianism, in two Sermons preached Dec. 13 and 20, at the Cathedral of Hereford. 8vo. London, 1720. [P. 116. (12.)] Waterland (Daniel) A Defense of the Divinity of Jesus Christ. 8vo. London, 1720. [N. 7. 28.] Whitby (Daniel) A Reply to Dr. Waterland's Defense. 1720. [R. 8. 57.] 8vo. London, Waterland (Daniel) An Answer to Dr. Whitby's Reply. 8vo. Cambridge, 1720. [P. 130. (4.)] Waterland (Daniel) The Unity of God not inconsistent with the Divinity of Christ. 8vo. London, 1720. [R. 8. 53.] A Reply to Dr. Waterland's Remarks on "The Unity," &c. London, 1720. [R. 8. 53.] KNIGHT (James) A Defence of the Divinity of Jesus Christ and of the Holy PYKE (Joseph) An Impartial View of the Difficulties that affect or clog the Another Copy. Svo. London, 1721. [P. 262. (2.)] Waterland (Daniel) A Vindication of Christ's Divinity. 2 vols. 8vo. Cambridge, 1721-31. [R. 12. 72,73.] Waterland (Daniel) The Case of Arian Subscription considered, and the seceral Pleas and Excuses for it particularly examined and confuted. 8vo. Cambridge, 1721. [N. 9. 20.] SYKES (Arthur Ashley) The Case of Subscription to the XXXIX Articles Considered; occasioned by Dr. Waterland's "Case of Arian Subscription. 8vo. London, 1721. [N. 9. 19.] Waterland (Daniel) A Supplement to the "Case of Arian Subscription." 8vo. London, 1722. [N. 9. 20.] Sykes (Arthur Ashley) A Reply to Dr. Waterland's Supplement to the Case of Arian Subscription; being, a Defence of the "Case of Subscription to the XXXIX Articles." 8vo. London, 1722. [N. 9. 19.] Waterland (Daniel) The Scriptures and the Arians compared in their accounts of God the Father and God the Son. 8vo. London, 1722. [N. 9. 18.] A Reply to Dr. Waterland's Defense of his Queries. 8vo. London, 1722. [D. 27. 9.] Jackson (John) Remarks on Dr. Waterland's Second Defense of some Queries; being a Brief Consideration of his Notion of the Trinity. 8vo. London, 1723. [P. 130. (6.)] Observations on Dr. Waterland's Second Defense of his Queries. By the Author of the Reply to his First Defence. 8vo. London, 1724. [P. 130. (8.)] Waterland (Daniel) A Familiar Discourse upon the Trinity. 8vo. London, 1723. [N. 9. 18.] CLARKE (Samuel) Observations on Dr. Waterland's Second Defense of his Queries. 8vo. London, 1724. [N. 9. 17.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1724. [P. 111. (5.)] Waterland (Daniel) A Farther Vindication of Christ's Divinity, in Answer to a Pamphlet, intituled Observations on Dr. Waterland's Second Defense. Svo. London, 1724. [L. 7. 12.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1724. [P. 130. 9.] Farther Remarks on Dr. Waterland's farther Vindication of Christ's Divinity. By Philalethes Cantabrigiensis. 8vo. London, 1724. [P. 130. (7.)] Staunton (William) An Epistolary Conference with Dr. Waterland, being a Proposal of a fourth Scheme, supported by Scripture and Demonstration. 8vo. London, 1724. [R. 9. 70.] Berriman (William) An Historical Account of the Controversies that have been in the Church concerning the Doctrine of the Trinity (in 1723–4). 8vo. London, 1725. [N. 7. 27.] Berriman (William) A Defence of some Passages in the Historical Account of the Trinitarian Controversy. 8vo. London, 1731. [N. 9. 32.] Hooke (J.) Creed-making and Creed-imposing considered; and the Divinity of Christ, and the Doctrine of the Trinity defended. 8vo. London, 1729. [P. 59. (5.)] Sykes (Arthur Ashley) The Innocency of Speculative Error asserted and vindicated. 8vo. London, 1729. [P. 57. (10.)] WEBSTER (William) Two Discourses. First, concerning the Nature of Error in Doctrines merely speculative. Second, shewing that the Doctrine of the Trinity is not merely speculative. In Answer to the Arguments of Mr. Sykes and Mr. Chubb. 8vo. London, 1729. [P. 57. (9.)] Brown (Simon) A Sober and Charitable Disquisition concerning the Importance of the Doctrine of the Trinity. 8vo. London, 1732. [P. 57. (5.)] Waterland (Daniel) The Importance of the Scripture Doctrine of the Holy Trinity asserted. 8vo. London, 1734. [R. 12. 74.] A Letter to Dr. Waterland, occasioned by some Passages in his Treatise entitled "The Importance of the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity asserted." 8vo. London, 1734. [P. 57. (6.)] A Letter to Dr. Waterland concerning the Nature and Value of Sincerity, with Remarks on his Treatment of it. 8vo. London, 1734. [P. 57. (7.)] Jackson (John) Christian Liberty asserted, and the Scripture Doctrine of the Trinity Vindicated, against a Book written by Dr. Waterland, and entituled "The Importance of the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity asserted." Svo. London, 1734. [P. 57. (S.)] Waterland (Daniel) A Supplement to the Treatise entituled "the Nature, Obligation, and Efficacy of the Christian Sacraments considered." 8vo. London, 1730. [N. 9. 31.] ii. Treatises occasioned by the Publications of Mr. Whiston. WHISTON (William) Primitive Christianity Revived. 4 vols. 8vo. London, 1711. [F. 6. 37-40.] Whiston (William) An Appendix to the Fourth Volume of "Primitive Christianity Revived." 8vo. [P. 270. (17.)] Whiston (William) An Historical Preface to "Primitive Christianity Revived;" with an Appendix containing an Account of the Author's Prosecution at, and Banishment from, the University of Cambridge. 8vo. London, 1711. [R. 8. 61.] Whiston (William) An Account of the Convocation's Proceedings with 8vo. London, 1711. [M. 19. 8.] 8vo. Lon Maittaire (Michael) The present Case of Mr. William Whiston, humbly represented in a Letter to the Clergy assembled in Convocation. don, 1711. [L. 15. 1.] Will-with-a-Wisp: or the Grand Ignis Fatuus of London: being a Layman's Letter to a Country Gentleman, concerning the Articles lately exhibited against Mr. Whiston. 8vo. London, 1714. [M. 19. 24.] Reasons for not proceeding against Mr. Whiston by the Court of Delegates. 8vo. London, 1713. [P. 276. (5.)] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1713. [R. 8. 62.] Allix (Peter) Remarks upon some Places of Mr. Whiston's Books. 8vo. London, 1711. [P. 111. (4.)] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1711. [R. 8. 63.] WHISTON (William) A Reply to Dr. Allix's "Remarks." 8vo. London, 1711. [P. 276. (3.)] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1711. [P. 107. (5.)] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1711. . [R. 8. 62.] Allix (Peter) An Answer to Mr. Whiston's "Reply." Whiston (William) A Second Reply to Dr. Allix. Whiston (William) A Letter to Dr. Sacheverell. 8vo. London, 1711. 8vo. London, 17—. MAITTAIRE (Michael) An Essay against Arianism and some other Heresies, in Reply to Mr. Whiston's Historical Preface and Appendix to his "Primitive Christianity Revived.” 8vo. London, 1711. [L. 15. 1.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1711. [P. 107. (3.)] KNIGHT (James) Considerations on Mr. Whiston's Historical Preface ; being an Answer to his Plain Queries and other Passages. 1711. [N. 9. 18.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1711. [R. 8. 63.] 8vo. London, Reflections on the Conduct of Mr. Whiston in his Revival of the Arian Heresy. 8vo. London, 1711. [P. 107. (7.)] Whiston (William) Animadversions on a Pamphlet intituled "The New Arian reproved." 8vo. London, 17-. [P. 107. (8.)] 8vo. Lon Knight (James) Primitive Christianity vindicated, in a Second Letter to the Author of the History of Montanism, against the Arian Misrepresentations of it, and Mr. Whiston's bold Assertions in his Books. don, 1712. [N. 9. 18.] Brief Observations and Reflections on Mr. Whiston's late Writings, falsely entituled "Primitive Christianity Revived;" shewing the unreasonableness, partiality, and inconsistency of his whole Performance. 8vo. London, 1712. [P. 276. (2.)] GRABE (John Ernest) An Essay on two Arabick Manuscripts of the Bodleian Library, and a Book called "The Doctrine of the Apostles." Wherein Mr. Whiston's mistakes about both are plainly proved. 8vo. London, 1712. [R. 8. 64.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1712. [N. 6. 44.] Whiston (William) Remarks on Dr. Grabe's Essay upon two Arabic Manuscripts of the Bodleian Library. 8vo. London, 1711. [R. 8. 62.] Some Instances of the Defects and Omissions in Mr. Whiston's Collection of Testimonies from the Scriptures and the Fathers against the true Deity of the Son. By Dr. Grabe. With an Account of Dr. Grabe and his MSS. by George Hickes, D. D. 8vo. London, 1712. [R. 8. 64.] OCKLEY (Simon) An Account of the Authority of the Arabic Manuscripts in the Bodleian Library controverted between Dr. Grabe and Mr. Whis8vo. London, 1712. [P. 106. (12.)] ton. Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1712. [R. 8. 64.] Whiston (William) Athanasius convicted of Forgery, in a Letter to Mr. Thirlby. 8vo. London, 1712. [R. 8. 62.] THIRLBY (Styan) A Defense of the Answer to Mr. Whiston's Suspicions, and an Answer to his Charge of Forgery against St. Athanasius. 8vo. London, 1713. [M. 20. 28.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1713. [R. 8. 63.] PLACE (Conyers) Heretical Characters illustrated and confirmed, with some Applications of them to Mr. Whiston, from Passages in his "Primitive Christianity." 8vo. London, 1713. [D. 6. 20.] HANCOCK (John) Arianism not the Primitive Christianity. 8vo. London, 1713. [N. 6. 44.] Whiston (Wm.) A Collection of Ancient Monuments relating to the Trinity and Incarnation, and to the History of the Fourth Century of the Church. 8vo. London, 1718. [F. 6. 44.] SMALBROKE (Richard) The Pretended Authority of the Clementine Consti8vo. London, 1714. tutions confuted: in Answer to Mr. Whiston. [N. 6. 44.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1714. [R. 8. 64.] |