ecclesiastics. The religious, in Catholic countries, are styled reverend fathers, and the abbesses, prioresses, &c., reverend mothers. In England, bishops are right reverend, archbishops most reverend, and the lower clergy reverend

REVERSION; the residue of an estate left in the grantor, to commence in possession after the determination of the particular estate granted. The estate returns to the grantor or his heirs after the grant is over.

REVIEWS. The French were the first to establish critical journals. The Bibliographia Parisina of Jacob (1645) was merely a yearly catalogue of new books, without remarks of any kind; but it is said to have suggested the idea of the Journal des Savans, a weekly journal, instituted in 1665, by M. de Sallo, which contained analyses and critical judgments of new works. It was afterwards edited by the abbés Gallois and De la Roque, and president Cousin. From 1715 to 1792, it was conducted by a society of scholars, and appeared in monthly numbers. In 1792, it was discontinued, and revived, in 1816, under the patronage of the crown. The collaborators since its revival have been De Sacy, Langlès, Raynouard, RaoulRochette, Rémusat, Dacier, Quatremère de Quincy, Letronne, Biot, Cuvier, &c. The collection from 1665 to 1792 forms 111 vols., 4to., reprinted Amsterdam (1684 seq.), 381 vols., 12mo. The Mercure de France, begun in 1672, under the title of Mercure Galant, and still continued, was originally designed for the amusement of the court, and men of the world, and was very miscellaneous in its contents. The editorship, which was bestowed as an act of court favor, was sometimes in good hands, as, for example, Marmontel's. The Année littéraire (1754-76) acquired celebrity under the management of Fréron. (q. v.) The Journal étranger (1754-62) and the Journal encyclopédique (1756-91) contained dissertations and papers of various kinds, as well as reviews. The Revue (originally Décade) philosophique, littéraire et politique (1794-1807), was for a time edited by Ginguené, and was distinguished for consistency of principle during a succession of most agitated periods. Millin's Annales (originally Magazin) encyclopédiques (1795-1818), together with critical reviews, contains a valuable mass of original essays, and a great variety of interesting intelligence relating to all countries. It has been succeeded by the Revue encyclopédique, which still appears in monthy numbers, on a similar but more extend

ed plan. The Revue was edited till the close of 1831 by Jullien (q. v.), and is now conducted by M. Hippolyte Carnot. The Bulletin universel (q. v.), conduc、ed by baron Ferussac, has appeared since 1824, and contains, as its name imports, information on every subject in literature, science, and the arts. The Revue Française was established in 1828, and has been conducted with great ability in the hands of Guizot (q. v.) and the duke de Broglie. The Revue Britannique (1825), Revue Germanique (1829), and Revue Européenne (1831), are monthly journals, de< voted, as their titles indicate, to foreign literature. In most of the French journals, the names of the authors are attached to each article. The freedom of the press in Holland led to the establishment, in that country, by learned foreigners, of some of the most valuable critical journals, which have appeared any where. Acute criticism, extensive erudition, and charm of style, are united in a remarkable degree in the Nouvelles de la République des Lcttres, edited from 1684 to 1687 by Bayle, and continued by other hands; the Histoire des Ouvrages des Savans, by Basnage (1687-1709); and the several journals conducted by Leclerc (Bibliothèque universelle, 1686-93, 23 vols.; Bibliothèque Choisie, 1703-13, 27 vols.; and Bibliothèque ancienne et moderne, 1714-27, 28 vols.). Besides these are distinguished the Journal littéraire (1713-37), Bibliothèque raisonnée (1728-51), and Bibliothèque nouvelle (1738-44). Among the Dutch literary journals, conducted by native scholars, the principal are De Boekzaal van Europe (from 1692, under different titles); Het Republyk de Geleerden (1710-48); Allgemeene Konst-en Letter-Bode (since 1788, which is most highly esteemed in Holland); De Recensent ook der Recensenten; the Vaderlandsche Bibliothek (1790), &c.-The Italian journals of criticism are characterized by the completeness of their analyses of works: the principal are the Giornale de' Letterati d'Italia (Venice, 1710-33), edited at first by Apostolo Zeno, and rich in materials of literary history; the Biblioteca Italiana (Milan, 1816 seq.), edited until 1826 by Acerbi, and since by Gironi, Carlini, and Fumagalli and distinguished for acuteness of criticism and freedom of judgment; the Novelle Letterarie (Florence, 1740), conducted for some time by the learned Lami; the Antologia di Firenze, which contains also original essays; the Effemeridi Letterarie, and the Giornale Arcadico (1819 seq.), both at Rome, and the Giornale enciclope

co (Naples, 1806), chiefly a selection from other journals. The Giornale de' Letterati (Pisa, 1771 seq.) was for a time edited by the celebrated biographer Fabbroni, and is one of the best Italian periodicals. The principal literary journals of Spain are the Diario de los Literatos de España (1737-43, 4 vols.), and the Memorial litterario de Madrid (1784-1807), which contain little more than an account of the contents of books. In 1831, a journal in Spanish was undertaken at Havana, under the title of Revista Bimestre Cubana, by Mariano Cubi i Soler.-Germany has been most fruitful in critical journals, which are more severely literary and learned than the English productions of the same kind. The earliest critical periodical is the well-known Acta Eruditorum (Leipsic, 1682-1776), established by Otto Mencke, and containing, besides reviews, original treatises. Thomasius's Monatsgespräche (1688-90), and Terzel's Monatliche Unterredungen (1689, continued under the title Curieuse Bibliothek), are among the earlier German journals of criticism. The Neuen Zeitungen von gelehrten Sachen (Leipsic, under different titles, 1715-97) gives an abstract of all native and foreign journals up to 1740. The Göttinger gelehrten Anzeigen (Göttingen, 1739, under different titles) was edited by Haller and Heyne, and contains contributions from Michaelis, Eichhorn, Blumenbach, Hugo, Spittler, Heeren, &c. The Briefe, die neueste Literatur betreffend (Berlin, 1759-65), by Lessing, Mendelssohn, Nicolai, &, and the Allgemeine Deutsche Bibliothek (Berlin, 1766-96, 118 vols., Neue Allg. Deutsche Bib. 1793 1806, 107 vols.), form a new period in German literature. The Allgemeine Literaturzeitung (Jena, 1785, transferred to Halle in 1804, edited by Schütz and Hufeland) took a yet wider range and a higher tone. On its removal to Halle, Eichhorn undertook the Neue Jenaische Allgem. Literaturzeitung (Jena, 1804). The Leipziger Literaturzeitung (since 1800, under several titles), and the Erlanger Literaturzeitung (1746-1810), are of inferior value. The Heidelberger Jahrbücher der Literatur (1808), and the Wiener Jahrbücher der Literatur (1818), have enjoyed considerable reputation. The Hermes (Leipsic, 1819, discontinued 1831, 35 vols.) was distinguished for its elevated tone, and depth and variety of erudition.-In England, the Gentleman's Magazine (1731), which at first consisted merely of selections from newspapers, curious intelligence, &c., is venerable for its age; it still appears, after

1

the lapse of a century, under the editorship of Sylvanus Urban (the original Urban was, as is well known, the bookseller Cave), and has acquired celebrity by the early connexion of Dr. Johnson with its publisher. There is an index extending from 1731 to 1786, and a second from 1787 to 1818 (2 vols., 1829), with a historical preface by Nichols. The Monthly Review (1749) was the first critical journal established in England; it was followed by the Critical Review (1756). The British Critic (1793) has appeared since 1827 in quarterly numbers, under the title of the Theological Review, and is the organ of the church party. A new era of periodical criticism, in Great Britain, began with the Edinburgh Review (q. v.), which took a wider range and a loftier tone, both in politics and literature, than had been assumed by any of its predecessors. The London Quarterly Review was established, under the management of Gifford, in 1809, and has supported tory and high church principles. In 1825, it passed into the hands of H. N. Coleridge, and is at present edited by Mr. Lockhart. The principal contributors to this journal have been Gifford, Southey, Scott, Croker, &c. These two Reviews are republished in the U. States; and there have recently been announced, as preparing for publication, Selections from the Edinburgh Review, with a Preliminary Dissertation and Notes by Maurice Cross, and Essays, moral, political and literary, selected from the Quarterly Review, with an Introduction by Mr. Lockhart. The Westminster Review (established in 1824) is the advocate of radical reform in church, state and legislation, and was established by the disci ples of Jeremy Bentham (q. v.), whose principles in law and morals it supports. The Foreign Quarterly Review (established in 1827) is devoted to foreign literatures. Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine (1817, edited by Wilson), though but partially occupied with critical matter, contains many able criticisms. Its politics are high tory. Tait's Edinburgh Magazine has recently been started (April, 1832), professedly to defend opposite principles in politics, and to assume a higher tone in literature than has been usually adopted by these smaller periodicals. The other English magazines are chiefly filled with matter of local or temporary importance. We must not, however, forget to mention the Retrospective Review (14 vols., ending in 1827), devoted to no tices of old works, and the celebrated Anti-Jacobin Review (chiefly political,

1798-1801). In the U. States, the principal journals of this kind are the North American Review, and the American Quarterly Review. The former was established at Boston, in 1815, by William Tudor, and at first consisted of essays, selections, poetical effusions, &c., with but little criticism. It was afterwards under the editorship of Mf. Channing, now professor of rhetoric in Harvard college, and assumed more the character of a critical journal. In 1820, it passed into the hands of Mr. Edward Everett, and in 1825 into those of Mr. Jared Sparks, from whom it was transferred, in 1830, to the present editor, Mr. Alexander H. Everett. A general index of the twenty-five first volumes was published in 1830. The work contains a mass of valuable information in regard to American politics, law, history, &c. The American Quarterly Review (Philadelphia, 1827) is edited by Mr. Robert Walsh. The Southern Review (Charleston, 1828), which was very ably conducted by the late Mr. Elliott (q. v.) and Mr. Legare, was discontinued with the close of the eighth volume (1832).

REVISE, among printers; a second or third proof of a sheet to be printed; taken off in order to be compared with the last proof, to see whether all the mistakes marked in it are actually corrected.

REVOLUTION, and INSURRECTION. We shall not here go into the question of the great changes wrought in the condition of society by political revolutions, which seem necessary to its progress, but shall confine ourselves to a few remarks on the right of insurrection against established governments. There has been much speculation on the subject whether citizens, under any circumstances, are allowed to take up arms against established authorities, and, if so, under what circumstances, &c. Without being able to enter here into all the arguments on this subject, the question may be briefly considered thus: If governments are instituted merely for the benefit of the people, it is clear that, if they have failed to answer their end, and will not submit to such changes as the people consider necessary, the people have the right, nay, are even under obligation, to overturn the existing system by force, on the general principle that all rights may be maintained by force when other means fail. The principle is so evident that it would never have been disputed, had it not been for monarchs and their supporters, who dreaded its application. In extreme cases, it is admitted by all.

None, for instance, would have denied the Arabs in Egypt, or the Berhers in Barbary, the right to rise against what was called their government-a band of cruel and rapacious robbers. But at what point does this right of insurrection begin? This point it is impossible to fix in the abstract. A treatise not confined to narrow limits, like this article, might make a full statement of cases imaginary or real, and point out what was demanded in each; might hold up to view the evils of a bad government on one side, and of civil war on the other, and endeavor to show under what circumstances it was better to endure the one or to hazard the other; but it could not lay down any general rule but the vague one already given. The character of insurrections, which, while they present some of the brightest and some of the foulest spots in history, always derange the frame-work of society, is such, that they will not, generally speaking, be lightly entered into. Fanatics may sometimes take up arms from slight causes; but, generally speaking, that principle in human nature which leads men to endure the evils of established systems as long as they are endurable, will be a sufficient security against the abuse of the indefinite rule which we have stated. But while we maintain the right of insurrection, under certain circumstances, from the inalienable rights of mankind, we also admit that it can never be lawful in the technical sense of the word, because it is a violation of all rules of positive law. All the rights which a citizen, as such, enjoys, emanate from the idea of the state; and the object of an insurrection is the destruction, at least for the time, of that order which lies at the basis of the state, by the substitution of force for law. The right of a citizen, as such, to rebel, is a contradiction in terms, as it implies that the state authorizes its own destruction. An insurrection becomes lawful, in the technical sense of the word, only when it has become a revolution, and has established a new order in the place of the old. We speak, of course, of insurrections against established governments. An insurrection to overthrow an usurpation is of a totally different character, as its object is the restoration of the established order, which has been arbitrarily interrupted. While, therefore, the right of insurrection is inherent in man, it can never be rationally admitted as a principle of any constitution of government; and it was equally unphilosophical and inexpedient for one of the

early French constitutions to give the right of opposing by force the exercise of unlawful power; but, from the constitution of human society, it hardly seems possible to avoid the occurrence of forcible changes in political systems. Nothing in this world can last forever; institutions established centuries ago, to answer the demands of a state of things which has long ceased to exist, frequently become extremely oppressive, from their inconsistency with the new tendencies which have sprung up in society. Sometimes the evil may be remedied without bloodshed; sometimes happy accidents facilitate a change; at other times, however, the old order of things assumes a tone of decided hostility to the new tendencies; and this is what must be expected in a large proportion of cases. Then it is that revolutions break out, and eventually establish a new order, from which new rights and laws emanate. While, therefore, the philosopher and historian acknowledge the necessity, and even obligation, of insurrections, they will, nevertheless, not fail to utter a solemn admonition against resorting rashly to this extreme remedy for violated right. There is a solidity, an authority, a completeness, in a political system which has acquired maturity by slow degrees and long struggles, that can never belong to any new system suddenly substituted in its stead. There can be no security for permanent liberty till the civic element has become developed, and men have become attached to a given system of social connexious. The common principle, therefore, of weighing the evil to be risked against the good to be gained, by a political revolution, needs to be strongly impressed upon every people in a state of political excitement.

REVOLUTIONARY TRIBUNAL. (See Ter

rorism.)

REYNARD THE Fox. (See Renard.) REYNOLDS, Sir Joshua, an eminent English painter, was born at Plympton, in Devonshire, in 1723, being the tenth child of the master of the grammar-school of that town. He early discovered a predilection for the art of drawing, which induced his father to place him, at the age of seventeen, with Hudson, the most famous portrait painter in London, with whom he remained three years, and then, upon some disagreement, returned into Devonshire. He passed some time without any determinate plan, and, from 1746 to 1749, pursued his profession in Devonshire and London, and acquired numerous

friends and patrons. Among the latter was captain (afterwards lord) Keppel, whom he accompanied on a cruise in the Mediterranean. He then proceeded to Rome, in which capital and other parts of Italy he spent three years. On his return to London, he painted a full-length portrait of captain Keppel, which was very much admired, and at once placed him at the head of the English portrait-painters. Rejecting the stiff, unvaried and unmeaning attitudes of former artists, he gave to his figures air and action adapted to their characters, and thereby displayed something of the dignity and invention of history. Although he never attained to perfect correctness in the naked figure, he has seldom been excelled in the ease and elegance of his faces, and the beauty and adaptation of his fancy draperies. His coloring may be said to be at once his excellence and his defect. Combining, in a high degree, the qualities of richness, brilliancy and freshness, he was often led to try modes which, probably from want of a due knowledge in chemistry and the mechanism of colors, frequently failed, and left his pictures, after a while, in a faded state. He rapidly acquired opulence; and, being universally regarded as at the head of his profession, he kept a splendid table, which was frequented by the best company in the kingdom, in respect to talents, learning and distinction. On the institution of the royal academy, in 1769, he was unanimously elected president; on which occasion the king conferred upon him the honor of knighthood. Although it was no prescribed part of his duty to read lectures, yet his zeal for the advancement of the fine arts induced him before the academy on the principles and practice of painting. Of these he pronounced fifteen, from 1769 to 1790, which were published in two sets, and form a standard work. In 1781 and 1783, he made tours in Holland and Flanders, and wrote an account of his journey, which consists only of short notes of the pictures which he saw, with an elaborate character of Rubens. He was a member of the celebrated club which contained the names of Johnson, Garrick, Burke, and others of the first rank of literary eminence, and seems to have been universally beloved and respected by his associates. He is the favorite character in Goldsmith's poem of Retaliation; and Johnson characterized him as one whom he should find the most difficulty how to abuse. In 1784, he succeeded Ramsay as portrait-painter to une

to deliver annual or biennial discourses

king, and continued to follow his profession, of which he was enthusiastically fond, until he lost the sight of one of his eyes. He, however, retained his equable spirits until threatened, in 1791, with the loss of his other eye, the apprehension of which, added to his habitual deafness, exceedingly depressed him. He died in 1792, in his sixtieth year, unmarried, and was interred in St. Paul's cathedral. Sir Joshua Reynolds, although there was scarcely a year in which his pencil did not produce some work of the historical kind, ranks chiefly in the class of portraitpainters. His Ugolino, and his Death of Cardinal Beaufort, are, however, deemed, in grandeur of composition and force of expression, among the first performances of the English school. But, on the whole, his powers of invention were inadequate to the higher flights of historic painting, although inexhaustible in portrait, to which he gave the most delightful variety. His character as a colorist has been already mentioned; and, though not a thorough master in drawing, he gave much grace to the turn of his figures, and dignity to the airs of his heads. As a writer, he obtained reputation by his Discourses, which are elegant and agreeable compositions, although sometimes vague and inconsistent. He also added notes to Dufresnoy's Art of Painting, and gave three papers on painting to the Idler. The Literary Works of Sir Joshua Reynolds were edited by Mr. Malone, in two volumes quarto, in 1797, with a life of the author. Farington and Northcote have written Memoirs of his life.

RHABDOMANCY is the power considered by some as existing in particular individuals, partly natural and partly acquired, of discovering things hid in the bowels of the earth, especially metals, ores, and bodies of water, by a change in their perceptions; and likewise the art of aiding the discovery of these substances by the use of certain instruments, for example, the divining rod. That rhabdomancy, generally speaking, is little more than self-delusion, or intentional deception, is now the opinion of most natural philosophers and physiologists; still it has some champions. According to Ritter and Amoretti's accounts (see Physical and Historical Inquiries into Rhabdomancy, &c., in German, by Carlo Amoretti, from the Italian, with Supplementary Treatises by Ritter, Berlin, 1809, and Amoretti's Elementi di Elettronetria Animale, Milan, 1816), an acceleration or retardation of the pulse, and a sensation of cold or heat in different parts

of the body, often so great as to affect the thermometer, take place in certain persons when they are in the vicinity of subterranean bodies of water or ore, &c.; also peculiar sensations of taste, spasmodic contractions of particular parts, convulsions often equal to electric shocks, giddiness, sickness, disquietude, solicitude, &c. Rhabdomancy was known even to the ancients. "From the most remote periods," says Kieser, in his System of Tellurism (in German, first volume)," indications are found of an art of discovering veins of ore and water concealed in the bowels of the earth, by a direct perception of their existence." The story of Lynceus is connected with this notion. Snorro Sturleson (Heimskringla, cller Snorro Sturleson's Wordlänske Konunga Sugor, Stockholm, 1697, folio, p. 1, c. vii) relates that Odin knew where gold, silver and ore lay hidden under the surface of the earth. Del Rio (Martin del Rio, Disquisitionum Magicarum Libri sex-Six Books of Magical Disquisitions-Cologne, 1633, quarto,) relates that there were some Spaniards, called Zahuris, who saw things concealed under the surface of the earth, such as veins of water and ores, and also dead bodies, &c. The instruments of rhabdomancy are known under the names of the sidereal pendulum, the bipolar cylinder, aud the divining rod. The magnetic pendulum consists of a small ball, of almost any substance (for example, metal, sulphur, wood, sealing-wax, glass, &c.), which is suspended from an untwisted string, such as the human hair, unspun silk, &c. In using this, the string of the pendulum is held fast between two fingers, and remains suspended over the sidereal substance (as, for example, a plate of metal, or a cup filled with water and salt), without motion. If, now (say the advocates of rhabdomancy), the person who holds the pendulum possesses, in any degree, the magnetic susceptibility (the rhabdomantic quality), the pendulum will move in a circular orbit, with some differences, according to circumstances. These circumstances are the substance of the pendulum and of the objects under it, the distance of the pendulum from these objects, and the nature of the person who holds the pendulum, and of those who come in contact with him, &c. The principal difference of the motion of the pendulum is, that it moves, in some cases, from left to right, that is, with the sun; in others, from right to left, or against the sun. That the mechanical motion of the fingers does not produce the vibration of the pendulum, at