Imatges de pàgina
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

- 648

- 237

- 370

- 431

207, 427

- 428

- 408

- 437

434, 437

457, 653, 655 395, 422 358

- 358

- 182, 237

328, 497

460

438, 758

268, 280, 281, 342

c. 50 (Munic. Corpor.) – 70, 197, 198, 199, 207, 253, 335, 370, 385, 432, 464, 531, 729, 732, 733, 740, 742, 749,

c. 64 (Exp. Laws Contin.)

c. 65 (Prison Charities)

c. 75 (Married Women)

784-786 - 655 135, 459, 682, 683 - 436

c. 80 (Allotments) - 135, 162, 253, 264, 453, 460, 489, 552,

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS.

Page 3, note (r).-A legacy for providing legacies for Unitarians not under 50 years of age attending a certain chapel has been held to be charitable: Re Wall, Pomeroy v. Willway, 37 W. R. 779. 4, note (z).—Add Cruwys v. Colman, 9 Ves. 319; Pope v. Whitcombe, 3 Mer. 689; Finch v. Hollingsworth, 25 L. J. Ch. 55. 12, note (b); 111, note (n); 112, note (s); 113, note (g).-Re Parish of St. Nicholas Acons is now reported 60 L. T. N. S. 532. 15, note (t), 406, 407, 408.-Buckley v. Royal National Lifeboat Institution, which is reported 41 Ch. D. 168, has been affirmed on appeal Times, 14th Nov. 1889.

note (u).-Re Dean, Cooper-Dean v. Stephens is now reported 41 Ch. D. 552.

23, note (q).—Add Re Fleetwood, Sidgreaves v. Brewer, 15 Ch. D. at p. 609.

25, note (m), line 18.-For 17, read 16.

29, note (u).—For 3 Atk. 356, read 1 Atk. 356.

30, note (ƒ).-For Freem. 261, read Freem. Ch. 261.

36, note (p).-For 99, read 399.

42, note (g).-For 2 J. & W. 170, read 2 J. & W. 270.

63, note (s).-Re Fitzgerald, Adolph v. Dolman is reported 26 W. R. 53.

note (t); 64, note (y).—Add Prichard v. Norris, 4 W. R. 733; Re Young, Young v. Dolman, 44 L. T. N. S. 499; Halse v. Rumford, 47 L. J. Ch. 559.

66, note (n).—Charity legacies carry interest from a year after the testator's death: Fisher v. Brierley (No. 3), 30 Beav. 268.

70, note (u), last line but one.-After "printed," insert "the former in App. I. and the latter."

75, note (8).-Add Att.-Gen. v. Lubbock, C. P. Coop. 15; Re St. John's College, 2 R. & M. 603.

77, note (e).-For clauses 67 and 68, read clauses 52 and 53. 96, note (ƒ).—As to the Court having no jurisdiction over the general property of ecclesiastical corporations, see also Att.Gen. v. Brereton, 2 Ves. Sen. at p. 426.

104, note (j).-Strike out reference to Re Douglas, Obert v. Barrow. 106, note (z); 156, note (f); 161, note (z).-Att.-Gen. v. Duke of Northumberland was affirmed on appeal 5 Times L. R. 719. 125, note (t).-For 2 S. & S., read 1 S. & S.

126, note (a).-For M'Call v. Atherton, read M'Coll v. Atherton. 127, note (i); 153, note (k).—Re Hyde's Trusts is reported 22 W. R. 69. 145, note (j).—For 3 Hare, 194, n., read 3 Hare, 195, n. 147, note (t).-A legacy for a synagogue at Jerusalem, which the trustees disclaimed, was applied for a parish school at Jerusalem: Re Davis' Trusts, Times, 5th August, 1889.

157, note (i), 533.-For Att.-Gen. v. Ironmongers' Co., read Ironmongers' Co. v. Att.-Gen.

160, note (t).-For Att.-Gen. v. Wrights of Glasgow, read Anderson v. Wrights of Glasgow.

175, note (1).—Add Re North Wingfield Charity, 3 L. T. N. S. 237.

Page 195, note (t); 210, note (n); 214, note (z); 234, note (i).—Att.-Gen. v. Lawson, add reference to 36 L. J. Ch. 130.

199, note (r).—Add Re Grantham Charities, 26 L. T. 302.
205, note (h).—Add Re St. John's College, 2 R. & M. 603.

207, note (a).—As to the powers of the University Commissioners,
see Re Pauncefort, Corporation of the Sons of the Clergy v. Christ
Church, Oxford, 61 L. T. N. S. 109.

note (h).-For App. II., read App. I.

note (k).-Add Herbert v. Dean and Chapter of Westminster, 1 P. Wms. 773.

221, note (8).-Re Parish of St. Edmund is now reported 60 L. T. N. S. 622.

235, note (8).-For cl. 16, read cl. 17.

237, note (g).-Add Guardians of Fulham v. Guardians of Thanet, 7 Q. B. D. 539.

238, note (a); 248, note (8).—Newsome v. Flowers, add reference to 30 Beav. 461.

239, note (o).—For Times, 13 Dec. 1881, read App. III. post.

240, note (y).—Add Re Dixon's Trust, 1 W. R. 244.

246, note (a).-Re St. John the Evangelist is also reported 59 L. T. N. S. 617.

253, 524, 528, 534, 557.-For Royal Society of London v. Thompson, read Royal Society of London and Thompson.

275, line 20.-The list of trustees' investments has been greatly extended by the Trust Investment Act, 1889 (52 & 53 Vict. c. 32), which repeals sect. 11 of 23 & 24 Vict. c. 38.

276, note (b). The consent of the charity trustees was also required for the acceptance of an offer of exchange or payment under the National Debt Redemption Act, 1889 (52 Vict. c. 4), in the case of consolidated and reduced three per cent. stock standing in the name of the official trustees of charitable funds: 52 Vict. c. 4, s. 11.

278, line 5.-After "however," insert in brackets "subject to 33 & 34 Vict. c. 34, ante, p. 277.”

288, note (g).-For 3 Mer., read 2 Mer.

291, note (n).-For 17 Beav. 215, read 17 Beav. 285.

295, last line but two.-Strike out comma after "cases."

297, 396.-Charity trustees may, where the trust deed is void for non-enrolment, acquire a good title under the Statutes of Limitation: Churcher v. Martin, 42 Ch. D. 312.

309, note (k).-For 4 Sim. 272, read 4 Sim. 275.

313, note (n). As to the election of medical officer of an infirmary, see Howard v. Hill, 37 W. R. 219. There is no right to vote by proxy unless given by statute or the rules of the society, and a proxy is only valid for the particular election for which it is given: ibid.

324, note (m).-All the beneficiaries are bound by proceedings to which the Att.-Gen. was party: Vince v. Walsh, 3 W. R. 7. 326, note (e).-Att.-Gen. v. Greenhill, add reference to 33 Beav. 193. 331, note (x).-For Re Lydford's Charity, read Re Lyford's Charity. 341, note (g).-For an attempt made by the Ecclesiastical Commissioners to attend the settlement of a scheme, see Att.-Gen. v. Wimborne School, 10 Beav. 209.

346, note (m).-Add Att.-Gen. v. Biddulph, 22 L. T. 114.

351, note (q).-Charities having the same interest are not allowed the costs of separate appearance: Foren v. Foxen, 13 W. R. 33.

Page 355, note (b).—For Re Thorner's Charity, read Ex parte Thorner's Charity.

356, note (p).—Add Re St. Dunstan's Charity Schools, 19 W. R. 887. 367, note (m).-For Rex v. Wilson and Rex v. Vange, read Reg. v. Wilson and Reg. v. Vange. Reg. v. Baptist Missionary Society, add reference to 10 Q. B. 884.

368, note (d).-For Rex v. Licensed Victuallers' Society, read Reg. v. Licensed Victuallers' Society.

385, line 1.-For Rex v. Allen, read Rex v. Newton.

391, line 13.-For Att.-Gen. v. Milbank, read Milbank v. Lambert. line 34.-Add Howard v. Earl of Fingall, 1 W. R. 515.

394, line 25.-For purchases, read purchasers.

396, line 14.-In Howard v. Earl of Fingall, 1 W. R. 515, the conveyance to charity was set aside.

409, line 43.-Re Taylor, Martin v. Freeman, is also reported 58 L. T. N. S. 538.

410, line 22.-A legacy to "create" a charitable institution has been
upheld: Re De Rosaz, Rymer v. De Rosaz, 5 Times L. R. 606.
412, line 5.-Add, after 35 Ch. D. 460, ibid. 50 L. J. Ch. 597; 51
L. J. Ch. 464.

414, line 5.—Add Re Ovey, Broadbent v. Barrow, 31 Ch. D. 113.
416, line 27.-For Precatory or Secret Trusts, read Precatory and
Secret Trusts.

417, line 12.-For Brook v. Badley, read Jones v. Badley.

last line but two.-Churcher v. Martin is now reported 42 Ch. D. 312.

418, last line but one.-Duncan v. Lawson is now reported 60 L. T. N. S. 732.

441, line 20.-The Statute of Mortmain has not been introduced into the law of British Honduras: Jex v. McKinney, 14 App. Cas. 77.

471, line 37.-Re St. Bride's, &c. Parish Estate, add reference to 35 Ch. D. 147, n.

481, line 6.-For 7 & 8 Vict. c. 18, read 8 & 9 Vict. c. 18.

497, line 2.-The jurisdiction conferred by this section is extended by sect. 9 of the Palatine Court of Durham Act, 1889 (52 & 53 Vict. c. 47), to the Palatine Court of Durham.

539, line 33.-For 33 Beav., read 23 Beav.

545, last line of note (a).—This bill has now become law under the name of the Trust Investment Act, 1889 (52 & 53 Vict. c. 32), which repeals sect. 11 of 23 & 24 Vict. c. 38. The Act is not expressed to apply to the official trustees of charitable funds. 563, line 19.-For p. 662, read p. 675.

598, 599, 601, 607, 612, 616-620.-The case of Christ's Hospital, which was heard before the Privy Council last June and in which judgment has not yet been delivered, raises questions of great importance upon sects. 5, 8, 13, 19, 24, 25 and 26, of the End. Schools Act, 1869, and upon other provisions of the End. Schools Acts.

655, note (c).—By the Expiring Laws Continuance Act, 1889, these powers are continued to the 31st of March, 1891.

699, line 29.-Add Re St. Botolph, Bishopsgate, School, Chapel, and Curate's Residence, 3 Times L. R. 553.

700, last line but three.-By the Expiring Laws Continuance Act, 1889, these powers are continued to the 31st of March, 1891.

« AnteriorContinua »