Thus tenderly was he treated; the governors of his college could hardly keep him, and yet wished. that he would not force them to drive him away,

Some time afterwards, he affumed an appearance of decency in his own phrafe, he whitened himself, having a defire to obtain the cenforfhip, an office of honour and fome profit in the college; but, when the election came, the preference was given to Mr. Foulkes, his junior: the fame, I fuppofe, that joined with Freind in an edition of part of Demofthenes. The cenfor is a tutor; and it was not thought proper to truft the fuperintendance of others to a man who took fo little care of himself.

From this time Smith employed his malice and his wit against the Dean, Dr. Aldrich, whom he confidered as the opponent of his claim. Of his Tampoon upon him, I once heard a fingle line too grofs to be repeated.

But he was ftill a genius and a scholar, and Oxford was unwilling to lofe him; he was endured, with all his pranks and his vices, two years longer; but on Dec. 20, 1705, at the inftance of all the canons, the fentence declared five years before was put in execution.

The execution was, I believe, filent and tender; for one of his friends, from whom I learned much of his life, appeared not to know it.

He was now driven to London, where he affociated himself with the Whigs, whether because they were in power, or because the Tories had expelled him, or because he was a Whig by principle, may perhaps be doubted. He was, however, careffed by men of great abilities, whatever were their party, and was fupported by the liberality of those who delighted in his converfation..

There

There was once a defign, hinted at by Oldifworth, to have made him ufeful. One evening, as he was fitting with a friend at a tavern, he was called down by the waiter; and, having ftaid fome time below, came up thoughtful. After a pause, faid he to his friend," He that wanted me below was Addifon, whofe bufinefs was to tell me that a History of the Revolution was intended, and "to propofe that I fhould undertake it. I faid, "What fhall I do with the character of Lord "Sunderland' and Addifon immediately returned, When, Rag, were you drunk laft?' and went "away."

Captain Rag was a name which he got at Oxford by his negligence of drefs.

This ftory I heard from the late Mr. Clark of Lincoln's Inn, to whom it was told by the friend of Smith.

Such fcruples might debar him from fome profitable employments; but, as they could not deprive him of any real esteem, they left him many friends; and no man was ever better introduced to the the atre than he, who, in that violent conflict of parties, had a Prologue and an Epilogue from the first wits on either fide.

But Learning and Nature will now and then take different courfes. His play pleafed the criticks, and the criticks only. It was, as Addifon has recorded, hardly heard the third night. Smith had indeed trufted entirely to his merit, had enfured no band of applauders, nor ufed any artifice to force fuccefs, and found that naked excellence was not fufficient for its own fupport.

The play, however, was bought by Lintot, who advanced the price from fifty guineas, the current

rate,

rate, to fixty and Halifax, the general patron, accepted the dedication. Smith's indolence kept him from writing the dedication, till Lintot, after fruitle's importunity, gave notice that he would publish the play without it. Now, therefore, it was written; and Halifax expected the author with his book, and had prepared to reward him with a place of three hundred pounds a year. Smith, by pride, or caprice, or indolence, or bafhfulness, neglected to attend him, though doubtlefs warned and preffed by his friends, and at laft miffed his reward by not going to folicit it.

Addifon has, in the Spectator, mentioned the neglect of Smith's tragedy as difgraceful to the nation, and imputes it to the fondness for operas then prevailing. The authority of Addifon is great; yet the voice of the people, when to please the people is the purpose, deferves regard. In this question, I cannot but think the people in the right. The fable is mythological, a story which we are accustomed to reject as falfe, and the manners are fo diftant from our own, that we know them not from fympathy, but by ftudy: the ignorant do not underftand the action; the learned reject it as a school-boy's tale; incredulus odi. What I cannot for a moment believe, I cannot for a moment behold with intereft or anxiety. The fentiments thus remote from life are removed yet further by the diction, which is too luxuriant and fplendid for dialogue, and envelopes the thoughts rather than difplays them. It is a fcholar's play, fuch as may please the reader rather than the spectator; the work of a vigorous and elegant mind, accustomed to pleafe itfelf with its own conceptions, but of little acquaintance with the courfe of life.

Dennis tells us, in one of his pieces, that he had once a design to have written the tragedy of Pha. dra; but was convinced that the action was too mythological.

In 1709, a year after the exhibition of Phedra, died John Philips, the friend and fellow-collegian of Smith, who, on that occafion, wrote a poem, which juftice muft place among the beft elegies which our language can fhew, an elegant mixture of fondnefs and admiration, of dignity and foftnefs. There are fome paffages too ludicrous; but every human performance has its faults.

This elegy it was the mode among his friends to purchase for a guinea; and, as his acquaintance was numerous, it was a very profitable poem.

Of his Pindar, mentioned by Oldifworth, I have never otherwife heard. His Longinus he intended to accompany with fome illuftrations, and had fe lected his inftances of the falfe Sublime from the works of Blackmore.

He refolved to try again the fortune of the Stage, with the ftory of Lady Jane Grey. It is not unlikely that his experience of the inefficacy and incredibility of a mythological tale might determine him to choose an action from English Hiftory, at no great diftance from our own times, which was to end in a real event, produced by the operation of known characters.

A fubject will not eafily occur that can give more opportunities of informing the understanding, for which Smith was unquestionably qualified, or for moving the paffions, in which I fufpect him to have had lefs power.

Having formed his plan, and collected materials, he declared that a few months would com

plete

plete his defign; and, that he might purfue bis work with lefs frequent avocations, he was, int June 1710, invited by Mr. George Ducket to his houfe at Garthain, in Wiltshire. Here he found fuch opportunities of indulgence as did not much forward his ftudies, and particularly fome ftrong ale, too delicious to be refifted. We ate and drank till he found himself plethorick; and, then refolving to cafe himself by evacuation, he wrote to an apothecary in the neighbourhood a prefeription of a purge fo forcible, that the apothecary thought it his duty to delay it till he had given notice of its danger. Smith, not pleafed with the contradiction of a shopman, and boaftful of his own knowledge, treated the notice with rude contempt, and fwallowed his own medicine, which, in July 1710, brought him to the grave. He was buried at Gartham.

Many years afterwards, Ducket communicated to Oldmixon, the hiftorian, an account pretended. to have been received from Smith, that Clarendon's hiftory was, in its publication, corrupted by Aldrich, Smaldridge, and Atterbury; and that Smith was employed to forge and infert the alter

ations.

This flory was published triumphantly by Oldmixon, and may be fuppofed to have been eagerly received; but its progrefs was foon checked; for finding its way into the Journal of Trevoux, it fell under the eye of Atterbury, then an exile in France, who immediately denied the charge, with this remarkable particular, that he never in his whole life had once spoken to Smith; his company being, as must be inferred, not accepted by thofe who attended to their characters.

The