 Court cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme circumstance of self-defence, in which the very survival of a State would be at stake; . . . F.  Nuclear Shadowboxing: Legacies and Challenges - Pągina 10per Vladimir Minkov, Vadim Simonenko, George Stanford - 2005Previsualització limitada - Sobre aquest llibre
 | L. Freedman - 2003 - 592 pągines
...armed conflict, and in particular the principles and rules of humanitarian law. However, in view of the current state of international law, and of the...of fact at its disposal, the Court cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme... | |
 | John Burroughs - 1998 - 192 pągines
...armed conflict, and in particular the principles and rules of humanitarian law; However, in view of the current state of international law, and of the...of fact at its disposal, the Court cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme... | |
 | Hague - 1997 - 266 pągines
...armed conflict, and in particular the principles and rules of humanitarian law; However, in view of the current state of international law, and of the...of fact at its disposal, the Court cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme... | |
 | Vladimir Đuro Degan - 1997 - 592 pągines
...divided seven to seven, the Court in its Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996 added: "However, in view of the current state of international law, and of the...of fact at its disposal, the Court cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme... | |
 | Douglas Roche - 1997 - 146 pągines
...principles and rules of humanitarian law." The next paragraph said, "The Court cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would...be lawful or unlawful in an extreme circumstance of self-defence, in which the very survival of a State would be at stake." The vote was tied 7-7, but... | |
 | Academie De Droit International De La Haye - 1997 - 464 pągines
...declaration that, in view of the current state of international law, it cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would...lawful or unlawful "in an extreme circumstance of selfdefence, in which the very survival of a State would be at stake"218. Thereby, the declaration... | |
 | Antony Anghie, Garry Sturgess - 1998 - 818 pągines
...nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the rules of international law ... However, in view of the current state of international law, and of the...of fact at its disposal, the Court cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme... | |
 | Glen Segell - 1998 - 64 pągines
...Assembly (UNGA) on the legal status of nuclear weapons. The deliberating judges stated that "in view of the current state of international law, and of the...of fact at its disposal, the Court cannot conclude defmitevely whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme... | |
 | E. Lauterpacht, C. J. Greenwood - 1998 - 884 pągines
...fundamentally disagree with its finding — secured by the President's casting vote — that: "in view of the current state of international law, and of the...of fact at its disposal, the Court cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme... | |
 | Yoram Dinstein, Fania Domb - 1998 - 380 pągines
...armed conflict, and in particular the principles and rules of humanitarian law; However, in view of the current state of international law, and of the...of fact at its disposal, the Court cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme... | |
| |
