Imatges de pàgina
PDF
EPUB

m

r

[ocr errors]

they the things which were spoken." Our Lord's historians also record that his disciples did not understand the nature of his kingdom' during his life, and after his resurrection; that they had repeated and very unseasonable" contentions among themselves who should be the greatest; that they were not able to cast out a demon; that they improperly Prebuked some who brought young children to Christ that he might bless them; that one of the apostles betrayed Jesus; that, when he was apprehended by the Jews, they all forsook him and fled; that they disbelieved the accounts of his resurrection, whether given them by several women on the authority of an angel, or by Mary Magdalene who had herself seen Jesus, or by the two disciples with whom he conversed as they went to Emmaus; and that Thomas " refused to credit the testimony of all the other apostles. On some of these occasions, or the like, they faithfully record their Master's animadversions. "Are ye also yet without understanding?" " Perceive ye not yet, neither understand? have ye your heart yet hardened? having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not? and do ye not remember?" And St. Mark writes that Jesus upbraided the eleven with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not those who had seen him after he was risen. When the very chief of the apostles are concerned, there is the same fidelity in the narration,

'Mark x. 35. Mark ix. 18. Luke xxiv. 11. w Matt. xv. 16.

m Luke xxiv. 21. n Mark ix. 34. Luke xxii. 24. 9 Mark xiv. 50. ■ John xx. 25.

P Matt. xix. 13.

$ Mark xvi. 11.
* Mark viii. 17, 18.

[ocr errors]

ib. 13.

Y C. xvi. 14.

с

We read that James and John were rebuked for their intolerant spirit, when they would have called down fire from heaven to consume the Samaritans; that Peter was a fearful and unbelieving, when he walked on the waves to meet Jesus; that this apostle was most sternly reprehended, when he wished our Lord's sufferings far from him; that Peter, James and John suffered themselves to be overcome by sleep, after a solemn exhortation to watch; that Peter drashly drew his sword, and smote a servant of the high priest; that he denied his Master with oaths. and imprecations, after vaunting that he would lay down his life for his sake; and that Peter and John believed NOT our Lord's resurrection, after having heard from Mary Magdalene the angel's assurance that he was risen, and seen the orderly state of the grave clothes in the sepulchre.

The authenticity of the gospels, besides the strong external evidence for it, appears from attention to their subject matter; our Lord's perfect character and doctrines; the extolling of moral duties; the disparaging of legal and traditionary observances; the declarations that the Gentiles were to be admitted into the church; and the prophecies that the Jewish temple and nation were to be destroyed. It is incredible that such men should write so far above all other men, and so contrary to the stream of their own ideas.

z Luke ix. 54, 5.

< Luke xxii. 40, 45.

Matt. xxvi. 74.

f

[blocks in formation]

John xx. 8. Beza's ms. inserts the negative

particle, and v. 9. proves that it should be inserted.

It is particularly observable of the evangelists, and indeed of the inspired writers in general, that not one of them speaks of the insufficiency of his own abilities, notwithstanding the greatness of the subject which he undertakes. In the genuine books of scripture there is no such language as the following: " If I have done well, and as is fitting the story, it is that which I desired; but if slenderly and meanly, it is that which I could attain unto."

The authors

of the sacred books shew a consciousness that they were writing under the all sufficient influence of the Spirit.

$ 2 Macc. xv. 38.

CHAPTER IV.

PROOFS IN OUR LORD'S CONDUCT THAT HE WAS NOT AN IMPOSTOR.

THE striking opposition between the tenour of our Lord's actions as a religious teacher, and what might naturally have been expected from a Jewish impostor, forms an argument for the reality of his divine mission with which I shall conclude.

After having received full attestations from the Baptist, whom all men held to be a prophet, after the descent of the Spirit in a bodily shape, and the approbation of God himself by a voice from heaven; instead of asserting his Messiahship in Jerusalem, where men were prepared to admit his claim, he retired into the desert during forty days, and then departed into the obscure country of Galilee.

a

с

He contradicted the reigning preconceptions of the Messiah, by his own humble appearance and his selection of humble followers. The worship of God which he required was a a spiritual one, unlike the ceremonies and pomp of the Jewish temple: his morality was too strict for worldly minded men: he declared his design to substitute an universal religion in the place of a national one: he preferred mercy to sacrifice; inveighed against Pharisaical traditions; neither practised himself, nor taught his disciples to practise Pharisaical austerities; and subjected himself to a charge of violating the sabbath, and to

Matt. iv. 1. Matt. viii. 20.

g

e

John i. 44. See Randolph's View, &c. p. 45. < John iv. 23, 4. ib. iv. 21. x. 16. f Matt. ix. 13.

[blocks in formation]

extreme danger, by repeatedly working miracles on that day.

Though John the Baptist attracted much notice, and all men held him to be a prophet, Jesus did not obtain his testimony by a preconcerted plan with him; but John knew him not till he came to be baptized.

The accounts of the wonders which preceded and followed his miraculous birth were not forgeries in which he was assisted by his kinsfolk; for they did not acknowledge his prophetical character: his religion and its evidences were not a political device; for he opposed, admonished and reprehended the Jewish rulers, and was hated and slain by them.

Nothing indeed could be at a greater distance from secular views than his behaviour to the rich, powerful, and wise men of this world. When a Jewish ruler came to him at the first passover, we see in him no earnest endeavour to secure so useful a convert. He discoursed of a new birth, of receiving the Spirit by baptism; and humbled his pride as a master in Israel for not comprehending his words. He shewed his own contempt of wealth, by intrusting Judas with the m bag, his only faithless follower, and one of whose faithlessness he had early knowledge; and he occasionally spake of the " deceitfulness and evil tendency of wealth; and described the rich as P suddenly cut off, and as lifting up their eyes in future torments after faring sumptuously in this life. The following language was used by him to one of that class, who asked him what he should do to

[blocks in formation]
« AnteriorContinua »