(4.) DISCOURSES ON THE RULE Of Faith. A Treatise, proving Scripture to be the Rule of Faith. By Reginald PEACOCK, Bishop of Chichester before the Reformation, about the year 1450. [Published, with a Preface, by Henry Wharton.] 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 6.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 16.] WHITAKERI (Gulielmi) Pro Auctoritate Sacræ Scripturæ adversus Thomam Stapletonum. folio, Cantabrigiæ, 1594. [E. 9. 21.] RAINOLDI (Johannis) Censura Librorum Apocryphorum Veteris Testamenti; adversus Pontificios, inprimis Robertum Bellarminum; qua tum divina et canonica Sacræ Scripturæ Autoritas asseritur solidissime : tum variæ Questiones et Controversiæ, tam dogmaticæ, quam historicæ, inprimis quæ est de Duratione Monarchiæ Persica et de 70 Hebdom. Danielis, expediuntur accuratissime. 2 tomis. 4to. Oppenhemii, 1611. [H. 6. 16,17.] USSERII (Jacobi) Historia Dogmatica Controversiæ inter Orthodoxos et Pontificios de Scripturis et Sacris Vernaculis. Digessit et edidit Henricus Wharton. 4to. Londini, 1690. [H. 5. 31.] TILLOTSON (John) The Rule, of Faith, or an Answer to the Treatise of Mr. J. S., [John Serjeant] entituled "Sure Footing." To which is adjoined, a Reply to Mr. J. S. his Third Appendix. By Edward Stillingfleet, B. D. 8vo. London, 1676. [I. 15. 40.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1676. [K. 19. 18.] Nubes Testium; or a Collection of Primitive Fathers, giving Testimony of the Faith once delivered to the Saints; being a full Discovery of the Sentiments of the Ancient Fathers in the chief Points of Controversie at present under debate. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 17.] An Answer to the Compiler of the "Nubes Testium :" wherein is shewn that Antiquity (in relation to the Points of Controversie set down by him) did not for the first five hundred years believe, teach, or practise, as the Church of Rome doth. [By Edward GEE.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 19.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 7.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [P. 25. (7.)] A Vindication of the Principles of the Author of the "Answer to the Compiler of the Nubes Testium" from the Charge of Popery, in Answer to a pretended Letter from a Dissenter to the Divines of the Church of England. [By Edward GEE.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 9.] Two other Copies. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 7. P. 25. (10.)] The Primitive Fathers no Protestants: or a Vindication of Nubes Testium from the Cavils of the Answerer. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 19.] The Primitive Fathers no Papists: in Reply to the preceding Vindication; to which is added, an Historical Discourse concerning the Invocation of Saints, in Answer to the Challenge of Father Lewis Sabran. [By Edward GEE.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 19.] Two other Copies. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 7. P. 25. (5.)] The Pope's Supremacy asserted, from the Considerations of some Protestants and the Practice of the Primitive Church, in a Dialogue between a ChurchDivine and a Seeker: in Vindication of Nubes Testium. With Allowance. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 9.] The Antiquity of the Protestant Religion. With an Answer to Mr. Sclater's Reasons, and to the Collections made by the Author of Nubes Testium, &c. [By Edward PELLING.] 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 7.] (5.) DISCOURSES WRITTEN ON SCRIPTURE PROOFs. The Judgement of Archbishop CRANMER concerning the People's Right to, and discreet Use of the Holy Scriptures. [Published, with a Preface, by Edward GEE.] 4to. London, 1689. 4to. London, 1689. [N. 8. 6.] -- Another Copy. 4to. London, 1689. [P. 24. (11.)] CROFT (Herbert, Bishop of Hereford) A Short Determination of all Controversies with the Papists by God's Holy Word. 4to. London, 1679. [M. 15. 13.] Seek and you shall find; or a Search into the Grounds of Religion, together with some Queries, in order to a particular satisfaction, upon account of the carious Opinions in this present age. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 21.] Popery not founded on Scripture: or the Texts which Papists cite out of the Bible, for the Proof of the Points of their Religion examined and shewed to be alledged without Ground. [By Dr. Thomas TENISON.] 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 13.] A Short Summary of the Principal Controversies between the Church of England and the Church of Rome: being a Vindication of several Protestant Doctrines in Answer to a pamphlet called "Protestancy destitute of Scripture Proofs." [By Dr. Wm. SHERLOCK.] 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 11.] An Answer to the Request to Protestants to produce their plain Scriptures, directly authorizing their Tenets. [By Dr. William SHERLOCK.] 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 11.] The Lay-Christian's Obligation to read the Holy Scriptures. [By Dr. N. STRATFORD.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 21.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 6.] An Answer to the "Address presented to the Ministers of the Church of England." [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 16.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 6.] A Clear Proof of the Certainty and Usefulness of the Protestant Rule of Faith, Scripture, after the help of Ministerial Guides, finally interpreted by each man's private sense. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 9.] A Vindication of the Answer to the Popish Address, presented to the Ministers of the Church of England. In Reply to the Clear Proof of the Certainty and Usefulness of the Protestant Rule of Faith,' &c. [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 9.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 6.] A LETTER to a Lady, furnishing her with Scripture Testimonies against the principal Points and Doctrines of Popery. 4to. London, 1688. [P. 24. (8.)] The Protestant and Popish Way of Interpreting Scripture impartially compared, in Answer to "Pax Vobis," &c. [By Dr. Robert GROVE.] 4to. London, 1689. [N. 8. 6.] (6.) DISCOURSES ON TRADITION. A Treatise of Traditions, Part I. Where it is proved that we have Evidence sufficient from Tradition: 1. That the Scriptures are the Word of God; 2. That the Church of England owns the True Canon of the Books of the Old Testament; 3. That the Copies of the Scripture have not been corrupted; 4. That the Romanists have no such Evidence for their Traditions; 5. That the Testimony of the present Church of Rome can be no sure Evidence of Apostolical Tradition; 6. What Traditions may securely be relyed upon, and what not. [By Dr. Daniel WHITBY.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 14. 28.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 4.] A Treatise of Traditions, Part II. Shewing the Novelty of the pretended Traditions of the Church of Rome. With an Answer to the Arguments of Mr. Mumford for Traditions, and a Demonstration that the Heathens made the same Plea from Tradition as the Romanists do, and that the Answer of the Fathers to it doth fully justifie the Protestants. [By Dr. Daniel WHITBY.] 4to. London, 1689. [N. 8. 4.] A Discourse about Tradition; shewing what is meant by it, and what Tradition is to be received, and what Tradition is to be rejected. [By Dr. Simon PATRICK.] 4to. London, 1683. [M. 14. 33.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1683. [N. 8. 4.] (7.) DISCOURSES ON THE CELIBACY OF THE CLERGY. MARTIN (Thomas) A Traictise declayring and plainly proving that the pretended Marriage of Priestes and professed persons is no Marriage, but altogether unlawful, and in all ages and in all countries of Christendom both forbidden and also punished. 4to. London, 1554. [E. 19. 17.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1554. [G. 16. 37.] PARKER (Matthew) A Defence of Priestes Marriages, stablysshed by the Imperiall Lawes of the Realme of Englande, agaynst a Civilian, namying hymselfe Thomas Martin Doctour of Civill Lawes. 4to. imprinted by Richarde Jugge. [Q. 4. 16.] GILBERT (M.) Jacob's Vow opposed to the Vows of Monks and Friers. Translated from the French by John Bulteel. 4to. London, 1617. [E. 1. 35.] An Answer to a Discourse concerning the Celibacy of the Clergy. [By George TULLY.] 4to. Oxford, 1688. [M. 14. 2.] Another Copy. 4to. Oxford, 1688. [N. 8. 14.] A Treatise of the Colibacy of the Clergy; wherein its Rise and Progress are historically considered. [By Henry WHARTON.] 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 11.] (8.) DISCOURSES ON THE LATIN SERVICE, OR PRAYER IN AN UNKNOWN TONGUE. A Discourse concerning the Celebration of Divine Service in an Unknown Reflections upon the Devotions of the Roman Church, with the Prayers, Hymns and Lessons themselves taken out of their authentic books. 8vo. London, 1686. [L. 7. 19.] A Treatise, in Confutation of the Latin Service practised, and by the Trent Council continued, in the Church of Rome. [By Dr. Daniel WHITBY.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 3.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 10.] (9.) DISCOURSES ON THE SACRAMENT OF THE LORD'S SUPPER AND ON THE REAL PRESENCE OF CHRIST IN THE EUCHARIST. 4to. London, ALLIX (Peter) An Historical Discourse concerning the Necessity of the Minister's Intention in administering the Sacraments. 1688. [M. 20. 1.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 3.] Assertionis Lvtheranæ Confvtatio per Reuerendum Patrem Ioannem [FISHERUM] Roffensem Episcopum, Academiæ Cantabrigiensis Cancellarium. folio, Antverpiæ, 1523. [M. 9. 3.] Exemplar aliud. Svo. Antverpiæ, 1545. [K. 17. 18.] Exemplar aliud. 8vo. Coloniæ, 1564. [G. 16. 30.] An Answer unto my Lord of Wyntchesters booke intytlyd "A Detection of the Devyls Sophistrye;" wherwith he robbeth the unlernyd people of the trew byleef in the moost blessyd sacrament of the Aulter, made by Johann HOPER. 4to. Zurich, 1547. [D. 19. 40.] CRANMER (Thomas, Archbp. of Canterbury) An Answer unto a crafty and sophisticall Cavillation devised by Stephen Gardiner Doctur of Law, late Bishop of Winchester, against the trewe and godly doctrine of the moste holy Sacrament of the Body and Bloud of our Saviour. folio, London, 1551. [B. 1. 19.] *A Defence of the True and Catholick Doctrine of the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Our Saviour Christ: with a Confutation of sundry Errors concerning the same. By the Most Rev. Thomas CRANMER, Lord Archbishop of Canterbury. To which is prefixed an Introduction, Historical and Critical, in Illustration of the Work; and in Vindication of the Character of the Author, and therewith of the Reformation in England, against some of the Allegations which have been recently made by the Rev. Dr. Lingard, the Rev. Dr. Milner, and Charles Butler, Esq. By the Rev. Henry John Todd, M. A. F. S. A. 8vo. London, 1825. MARTYRIS (Petri) Defensio Doctrine Veteris et Apostolicæ de Sacrosancto Eucharistiæ Sacramento adversus Stephani Gardineri quondam Wintoniensis Episcopi Librum, sub nomine M. Antonii Constantii editum. folio, Tiguri, 1562. [L. 12. 23.] MORNEI (Philippi) De Sacra Eucharistia Quatuor Libri. folio, Hanoviæ, 1605. [L. 13. 2.] MORTONI (Thomæ Episcopi Dunelmensis) Totius Doctrinalis Controversiæ de Eucharistiâ Decisio. 4to. Cantabrigiæ, 1640. [K. 20. 19.] ARNAUD (Antoine) La Perpetuité de la Foy de l'Eglise Catholique touchant Eucharistie. 12mo. Puris, 1672. [L. 8. 7.] CLAUDE (Jean) Reponse au Livre de M. Arnaud, intitulé “La Perpetuité de la Foi de l'Eglise Catholique tonchant l'Eucharistie defendue." 8vo. 2 vols. Quevilly, 1671. [L. 7. 22,23.] Reponse aux Deux Traitez intitulez "La Perpetuité de la Foy de l'Eglise Catholique touchant l'Eucharistie." 4to. Charenton, 1668. [N. 6. 5.] ARNAUD (Antoine) Lu Perpetuité de la Foy de l'Eglise Catholique, touchant l'Eucharistie, deffendue contre le Livre du Sieur Claude. 4to. Paris, 1670. [E. 14. 11.] Determinatio Fr. Joannis, Parisiensis Prædicatoris, de modo existendi Corporis Christi in Sacramento Altaris. Cui prefixa est Præfatio Historica de Dogmate Trans-substantiationis. [Auctore Gulielmo Allix.] 4to. Londini, 1686. [L. 15. 35.] Exemplar uliud. 4to. Londini, 1686. [N. 9. 42.] A Peaceable Method for the re-uniting Protestants and Catholicks in matters of Faith; principally in the Subject of the Holy Eucharist. From the French of Lewis Maimbourg. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 17.] A Brief Discourse on the Real Presence of the Body and Blood of Christ in the Celebration of the Holy Eucharist, wherein the witty artifices of the Bishop of Meaux and of Monsieur Maimbourg are obviated, whereby they would draw in the Protestants to imbrace the Doctrine of Transubstantiation. (By Dr. Henry MORE.) 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 17.] Two Discourses concerning the Adoration of our B. Saviour in the H. Eucharist. The First Animadversions upon the Alterations of the Rubrick in the Communion Service in the Common Prayer Book of the Church of England. The Second: The Catholick's Defence for their Adoration of our Lord, as believed really and substantially present in the Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist. [By Abraham WOODHEAD.] 4to. Oxford, 1686. [M. 14. 18.] A Discourse of the Holy Eucharist, in the two great points of the Real Presence and the Adoration of the Host, in Answer to the Two Discourses printed at Oxford on this subject. [By Dr. William WAKE.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 18.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 8.] A Reply to Two Discourses, lately printed at Oxford, concerning the Adoration of our Blessed Saviour in the Holy Eucharist. [By Henry ALDRICH.] 4to. Oxford, 1687. [M. 14. 2.] Another Copy. 4to. Oxford, 1687. [N. 8. 14.] A Compendious Discourse on the Eucharist [in Reply to the publications of Wake and Aldrich. By Abraham WOODHEAD.] 4to. Oxford, 1688. [M. 14. 29.] A Discourse concerning the Adoration of the Host, as it is taught and practised in the Church of Rome. [By William PAYNE.] 4to. London, 1685. [N. 8. 9.] |