Imatges de pàgina
PDF
EPUB

further, that a most unholy alliance was formed between that party and those in Scotland who were for secular education; but luckily it was broken up, as they could not agree amongst themselves. They were only united upon one point, and that was to destroy the parochial schools. He hoped that any measure which the Government might hereafter introduce would be carefully considered, and that they would resolve not to be guided by the views of one party only.

THE DUKE OF ARGYLL would impress on the minds of all his noble Friends connected with Scotland, he would not say the impossibility of treating this question adequately, upon an incidental discussion such as this, but the impossibility of dealing with it with even tolerable fairness. It was a very large subject, the question of education, whether in England, Scotland, or Ireland-connected with very large principles of public policy, and requiring very careful examination. He almost regretted that his noble Friend who had just sat down had withdrawn the notice he had placed on the table; because, though he (the Duke of Argyll) should have been compelled to vote against it, he should have thought it a fit occasion for bringing under the notice of their Lordships' House the views under which Her Majesty's Government had introduced the recent measure on the subject of education in the other House of Parliament. He should now look forward to the occasion when the Bill which had just been announced by the noble Earl at the head of the Government should reach their Lordships' House for an opportunity of stating his views. Till that time he hoped their Lordships would preserve an impartial judgment on the question. THE EARL OF HADDINGTON said, he was certain there was no want of sympathy on this subject in their Lordships' House. He could assure their Lordships that the benefit of the schools of the Established Church of Scotland was not confined to the members of that communion. Free Church children and Dissenters flocked to those schools; and he knew that in the West Highlands, a great many Roman Catholic children had attended them constantly till they were prevented by their priests. A noble and learned Lord (Lord Brougham) had stated the other day, in presenting a petition on this subject, that Lord Dunfermline, and those who concurred with him, had not been actuated by the least opposition to plans for the education Lord Kinnaird

of the people, nor influenced by any such motive. He heartily rejoiced to hear the announcement that had been made by the noble Earl at the head of the Government. He would suggest to that noble Earl that, regard being had to the peculiar circumstances of the case, he should introduce two measures on this great and important subject. In Scotland there was great diversity between town and country. Although what his noble Friend who spoke last said might be perfectly true, and although the want of the means of education had been a little exaggerated in the accounts that had reached their Lordships, still he believed it wholly impossible to exaggerate the want of the means of education that existed in the towns. The parish school system, which had for centuries been of the greatest benefit to Scotland, had unhappily been found inapplicable to towns, which, consequently, were left without adequate means of education, except what were given by voluntary exertion. He believed the Church of Scotland to be anxious for the education of the people; he also believed the Free Church to be anxious for the education of the people; and he trusted that they would show it, and not lead it to be believed that they only aimed at victory the one over the other.

LORD BROUGHAM said, that, on a previous occasion, when he had presented a petition on the subject of the Bill then before the other House of Parliament, and which they had unfortunately rejected, he had taken the opportunity of stating that not only his noble and learned Friend Lord Dunfermline, but those who concurred with him in opposing the measure, were not actuated by any decided opposition to the plan for the education of the people of Scotland, nor were they influenced by any coldness in that great and important cause. He heartily rejoiced that the noble Earl at the head of the Government had made the announcement which their Lordships had heard of the intentions of the Government in respect of the stipends of the schoolmasters, and, if he might be permitted, he should wish to suggest, in reference to any measure that might be hereafter introduced in respect of education, that regard be had to the peculiar circumstances of Scotland, and that two measures should be introduced instead of one. There was the greatest diversity between the towns and the country parts; and, although what had been stated by his noble Friend about

the want of the means of education in the country parts might be true, still there had been a considerable amount of exaggeration as regarded the educational wants of those districts. With regard, however, to the towns, the case was very different, and it was impossible to exaggerate the want of the means of instruction in the towns of Scotland to which the parochial system was not applicable. The only means for the advancement of education in the towns were derived from the voluntary exertions of individuals, and it was quite clear that we could not leave so important a subject as the education of the people to mere individual exertion. He trusted that the Government would justify the opinion he ventured to entertain, and that in dealing with this question they would show themselves anxious for the education of the people, and prove that there was one thing which they valued more than even a victory of the Established Church over the Free Church, or of the Free Church over the Establishment.

THE EARL OF ABERDEEN said, he was afraid that his noble and learned Friend had a little misapprehended what he had stated. What he said was, that a Bill would be shortly introduced to make a temporary provision for the schoolmasters in Scotland, but he did not give any assurance of a measure for education in Scotland being introduced during the present Session.

LORD BROUGHAM was sorry that the noble Earl could extend his assurance no further.

THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH said, he hoped the operation of this temporary measure would not be so limited in duration as that the schoolmasters would find themselves a twelvemonth hence in the same situation that they were now. He wished it to be clearly understood that the schools in Scotland were not exclusive. There was no system of education so open in the whole world as that of the parochial schools in Scotland; for there was not the slightest impediment to children of any religious denomination attending them. therefore, difficulties were interposed by other parties, the children of Roman Catholics. Episcopalians, and Dissenters could and did attend the parochial schools with the utmost freedom. It was, therefore, not liable to cause misapprehension to state that there was anything in the slightest degree exclusive in the Scotch system of parochial schools. He trusted that the

Unless,

suggestion thrown out by the noble and learned Lord (Lord Brougham) would meet with consideration, and that two Bills would be introduced. It was necessary to bestow the utmost care upon any measure of education which was intended only as the precursor to a more general change, and he hoped that when another measure was introduced it might not be left to the management of one person, but that it would be supported by the united weight of the Government.

THE MARQUESS OF BREADALBANE had spoken of the Scotch parochial schools as being "exclusive because the masters were compelled to be members of the Established Church of Scotland, and to subscribe to the tenets and doctrines of that Church, and no man, however well qualified, could become a schoolmaster unless he was a member of the Established Church, which did not now comprise more than a third of the people.

THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH said, that these remarks came very ill from a member of a sect, the trust deeds of whose schools were drawn with the utmost care, so as by the most rigorous tests to prevent any but one of their own body becoming a master therein.

THE MARQUESS OF BREADALBANE said, he was against all religious tests; he thought that the more we got rid of them the better. There must, no doubt, be some declaration of principle in cases like those under discussion; but he heard with great satisfaction that the noble Duke was opposed to religious tests generally.

LORD BROUGHAM said, that he only hoped that, amidst the differences of the contending parties, the scheme for the education of the people would not fall to the ground.

Petition ordered to lie on the table.
House adjourned till To-morrow.

HOUSE OF COMMON S, Monday, May 22, 1854. MINUTES ] PUBLIC BILLS.-1° Sheriff and Sheriff Clerk of Chancery (Scotland). 3° Customs Duties.

WAYS AND MEANS-EXCHEQUER

BONDS.

On the question that Mr. Speaker do leave the Chair,

MR. T. BARING said-I wish to explain the change it is necessary for me to make in the course I intended to pursue. I

had understood from the noble Lord (Lord J. Russell), on the first introduction of the Resolutions of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, that the first Resolution which was adopted in Committee would be reported, and on that Report would follow any discussion that might apply to the general system of finance. I then gave notice that I should move an amendment upon bringing up the Report, but since that the noble Lord has changed the course of proceeding, and we are called up on to go into Committee before reporting the first Resolution. As I cannot, from the forms of the House, refer in the House to what passed in Committee, I will defer the Resolution of which I have given notice as an Amendment till we are in Committee, and probably till after hearing from the Chancellor of the Exchequer the reasons for the change in the Resolution which he has since introduced.

House in Committee.

THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER: I do not rise, Sir, for the purpose of making any statement upon the subject of the merits of the Resolution in your hands, over and above the general statement which I have already made to the House upon that subject, but simply for the purpose of noticing what has fallen from the hon. Member for Huntingdon, who, I think, appears to be in error with regard to what was stated by my noble Friend as to the originally intended course of proceeding upon this matter. As far as the Government is concerned, there has been no change whatever in their intentions and announcements from the commencement; the only change that has occurred has occurred in consequence of suggestions made from the other side, and, in deference to such suggestions as appeared to be reasonable. The proposals of the Government were twofold. In the first place they went to an enlargement of the permanent resources of the country

I should rather say of the Exchequer; and, in the second place, they went to make a temporary provision of the funds to supply the wants of the Exchequer during the interval before the new taxes could come into play. I cannot, therefore, understand how there can have been any misapprehension on the subject of the order of proceeding, because I was most careful to state, in introducing the whole matter to the House, that the order of proceeding would be this-w -we should in the first instance take votes upon all the new taxes,

Mr. T. Baring

[ocr errors]

and then ask for votes with respect to what I will call the cash provision that was to be made, with this single exception, that, as certain contracts had been entered into, it was necessary to ask the assent of the Committee to, or at least the opinion of the Committee upon, these contracts without any delay. The Committee was pleased to give its opinion in favour of adhering to those contracts. That being so, there was no reason for departing in any particular whatever from the order of proceeding I had announced-namely, taking in the first instance decisive votes on the taxes, and then submitting to the House or the Committee the provision that must be made for the wants of the Treasury in the interval. On that principle it is that I have now moved that Mr. Speaker should leave the Chair, and that the opinion of the Committee should be taken upon the proposal that is made for raising money either by Exchequer bonds or Exchequer bills. The Resolution that has passed through Committee has reference rather to the contracts already made than to the general question of policy with regard to the raising of this money. It therefore appears to me that this order of proceeding is that which is most natural and conformable to the common sense of the case, and it certainly conforms with the announcement originally made by the Government.

Motion made, and Question proposed"That the Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury be authorised to issue Exchequer Bonds bearing interest at the rate of 31. 103. per centum per annum for any sums not exceeding in the determined upon by the said Commissioners, such whole 4,000,000l., at any prices and on any terms Bonds to be paid off at par at the expiration of any period or periods not exceeding six years from the date of such Bonds."

MR. DISRAELI: This order of proceeding may be the most natural one under the circumstances, but it certainly is not the one which hon. Gentlemen on this side of the House understood to have been assented to. The House has seen to-night the great disadvantage of its having been induced without any discussion to pass this formal Resolution. There was a most distinct declaration on the part of the noble Lord that the Committee was clearly to understand that by the passing of the formal Resolution no person whatever was bound in any way, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer has now treated the formal passing of that Resolution in Committee as a sanction of the Resolution by the House. Now, with reference to the un

derstanding upon which we supposed this business was to be conducted, I can only say that I did understand from the noble Lord most distinctly that the Report to the House of the Resolution then formally passed in Committee should be taken the first thing on this day week last, in order that the opinion of the House should be taken on the general financial scheme of the Government. Unfortunate circum、 stances prevented our then entering into the discussion, but I did certainly understand from the noble Lord that the Report of this formal Resolution was to be made last Monday, in order that the opinion of the House should be taken on the general statement of the Chancellor of the Exchequer. In proof of the accuracy of my impression I will recall to the recollection of the Committee that there was a second proposition made by the noble Lord. It was in consequence of our demurring to pass the formal Resolution in Committee that the noble Lord, who had intended originally to press the Report of the Resolution to the House, said, "Very well; under those circumstances we will put it off till Monday week, when the whole discussion on all the propositions will be taken on the Report of the first Resolution." I believe this is an accurate version of what occurred.

1

House. I certainly am of opinion that the original engagement which the noble Lord entered into with the House has not been fulfilled.

THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER: My noble Friend and the right hon. Gentleman are, I apprehend, entirely at issue as to what the original engagement was. In another of his observations the right hon. Gentleman has fallen into a serious error. He says, "We see from this the great inconvenience of allowing these to pass as formal Resolutions, being told that they would not in any way commit the House, and that the judgment of the House would be given at a future stage." That is an entire misapprehension so far as regards the point at issue. With respect to the taxing Resolutions, that is no doubt perfectly true. They were taken purely as a matter of form, to enable the revenue officers to proceed in such a way as to prevent evasion; but when we came to the Resolution relating to Exchequer bonds, neither I nor any one else connected with the Government ever represented that as a formal Resolution. I said that it was necessary, and conformable with all precedent, that we should have the immediate judgment of the House upon it. It was not a formal judgment, but we solicited it from the Committee in order that the parties with whom the Government had entered into contracts might be made at once aware whether it was the intention of the House to ratify or disapprove it.

LORD JOHN RUSSELL: I thought, Sir, it had been perfectly clear that, though I postponed the Report of the Resolution in order that the right hon. Gentleman might have an opportunity of stating his MR. DISRAELI That is the very views with regard to the general proposi- point. The right hon. Gentleman has tion of my right hon. Friend the Chancel- never had the judgment of the House upon lor of the Exchequer, yet that it was un-it, but only of the Committee; and it was derstood, either that the Report or the because I and other hon. Members assented further Resolutions in Committee should to that Resolution that the postponement be taken on the day when that debate was originally proposed. came on. The right hon. Gentleman once, SIR HENRY WILLOUGHBY: I wish, if not more than once, asked me which Sir, to call the attention of the Committee was to be taken first. It seemed to me to what appears to me to be a practical that the more convenient order would be difficulty. I certainly understood that the to take the Committee before the Report, whole question of the principle of the and, when the right hon. Gentleman asked Budget was to have been discussed upon me which would be taken first, I answered the Report; but the difficulty which occurs that the Committee would come first. All to me is this:-A resolution has been that I engaged was that the Report should not be taken as a matter of form, but should be open to discussion.

MR. DISRAELI: My hon. Friend, the Member for Huntingdon (Mr. T. Baring) had given notice of his Amendment previously to the period to which the noble Lord refers, having been of the same impression as others upon this side of the

passed as regards the first 2,000,000l. of Exchequer bonds, which stands second for the Report to-day; but there are three new Resolutions involving some important questions, which are now to be submitted for the first time to the Committee, and I ask, is it fair to call upon us to pass a judgment upon those Resolutions unless the right hon. Gentleman states what are the

grounds upon which he calls for the extra- | ment, for he knew, and had seen, the diffiordinary power of being entitled, whenever culties with which every Chancellor of the he pleases, any time within the next six years, to issue Exchequer bonds or Exchequer bills to the extent of 4,000,000l., and at any terms which he is to fix at the time? This is a question of great importance, because it is utterly impossible to know why such extensive powers are required unless we have some information upon the subject from the Finance Minister, who is now in the position of initiating a new set of mea

sures.

THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER: Sir, as regards the general grounds upon which this proposition was founded, I did endeavour to state them upon a former occasion, and I certainly did not expect to hear the objection raised, that I had not stated them with sufficient fulness upon the occasion to which I refer. These Resolutions are general in their character, and are preparatory to a Bill. They do not contain everything that is to be provided in the Bill. On the contrary, there are various important provisions which must be inserted in the Bill, and which it is not the custom to comprise in the preliminary Resolutions, which are rather submitted for the purpose of raising the question in a broad and simple form. With respect to the limitation of time within which this money is to be raised, there is no occasion why the Government should ask power to raise money at any time within six years. It is intended to take powers applicable to the present financial year only, and when we come to the Bill, provisions will be inserted to that effect. In taking power to dispose of these bonds at any terms, I only follow the precedent which has been invariably adopted on these

Exchequer had to contend, even in times of peace. There had been difficulties in former years arising from the contraction of revenue, from commercial crises, or a famine in Ireland-events entirely beyond the foresight or control of the Government of the day. On the present occasion, whatever the difficulties with which the Chancellor of the Exchequer had had to contend, it appeared to him that they had arisen from the conduct of the finances during the past year, and that they had been the creation of the policy of Her Majesty's Government. It would appear, therefore, to be natural, when a remedy for those difficulties-novel and somewhat extraordinary-was being proposed, that it should have the full and attentive consideration of that House. At the same time, he himself should not have originated any Amendment, had it not been for the speech with which the introduction of these Resolutions had been accompanieda speech, no doubt, of the greatest talent, and which even those who differed from the sentiments conveyed in it had heard with admiration. The right hon. Gentleman the Chancellor of the Exchequer told the House that the policy of the past was to be the policy of the present and of the future; he connected what had been done with what was to be done, and he called upon the House to give its approbation to that policy because it was to be prospective as well as retrospective. Thinking, as he (Mr. Baring) did, that those measures which had been adopted last year were illadvised and wanting in prudence and caution, and had therefore been unsuccessful, he conceived that the Committee would be acting very wrongly to acquiesce in the MR. T. BARING said, it certainly had declaration, that the principles which had been his impression that the understanding guided the Government last year in finance was that the first Resolution should be re- were those which should be approved and ported before they proceeded in Committee maintained for the future. The Chancellor with the other Resolutions. That being of the Exchequer had stated, with perfect so, he had framed his Amendment as ap- fairness, that it was necessary, in order to plicable to the first Resolution, and to be judge of the merits or demerits of the past taken upon the Report. He thought it measures, to consider what was the position more for the convenience of the Commit- of affairs fifteen months ago. He pertee, however, that he should state now his fectly agreed with the right hon. Gentleobjection to those Resolutions, and move in man in the justice of that proposition, and Committee the Amendment of which he he would state the reasons why he thought had given notice, and which he had intend- that fifteen months ago the financial meaed to have moved in the House. He could sures which were adopted by the Governsincerely say, that he would very gladly ment were not judicious. In the first have given a silent vote in favour of the place, nothing could have been more fafinancial plan of Her Majesty's Govern-vourable than the position of the ChanSir H. Willoughby

occasions.

« AnteriorContinua »