him concerning the neceffity of C CAIANITES, a fect of the Gnof- 31. CALVIN queftioned the authority CANON of the New Testament more difficult to fettle, than that citation of a book in facred writ- CANTERBURY, prefent Archbi- CASAUBON, a citation from him cerning the Hypotyposes, 374, n. CELSUS, his objection to our Savi- velation not extant, 120. feems nonical Revelation, 184, 185, n. RIACK. he taught his difciples, not extant, 120, 186. not mentioned till Auftin's time, except an Epiftle to Abgarus, &c. ibid. that to Peter and Paul proved out of Auftin to be a ridiculous forgery, 188. another book mentioned under his name, 190. he is falfely charged by the Jews and Celfus, as a magician, 191. an idle trite ftory of the former to the fame purpose, ibid. a spurious Epiftle of his among the Manichees, 193, n. a hymn forged by the Prifcillianifts under his name proved fpurious, 195, n. a faying of his mentioned by St. Paul, 408. others afcribed to him in the Epistle of Barnabas, 409. others by Clemens, fuppofed to be the fame mentioned by St. Paul, 412. a fragment in his name cited by Irenæus, 416, n. a difcourfe afcribed to him by Papias, 422. another by the fame, 423. a faying of his out of Juftin Martyr, 425. hiftory of his baptifm by the fame, 428. another concerning him in his younger years, by the fame, 430. a faying of him in Irenæus, 433. hiftory of his age in the fame, 434. a faying afcribed to him in Athenagoras, and a continuation of it by Pfaffius, 436. another by Clemens Alexandrinus, 437. another by the fame, 442. another cited by moft of the antient Fathers, 438. hiftory of him and his parents by Origen, 444. of his relations according to the flesh in Epiphanius, 445. an answer of the Apostles to him in Jerome, 447. hiftories and fayings of, and things relating to him, to be found in the Alcoran of Mahomet, 451. four particular fayings afcribed to him by the Mahometan doctors, 469. CHRYSOSTOM makes no mention of the adulterous woman in John viii. p. 111. CLARKE, Dr. a mistake of his concerning Mr. Dodwell, rectified, 5. n. CLEMENS ALEXANDRINUS, A pocryphal books mentioned by him, 30. makes no mention of the adulterous woman in John viii. p. 111. his teftimonies of the Gospel of the Egyptians, 198. n. his interpretation of £ Cor. vii. 1. and 1 Tim. iv. 3. p. 209. n. mentions the traditions of Matthias, 255. His account of the Nazarene or Hebrew Gofpel, 268. n. does not appeal to the Hebrew Gofpel as of any authority, 297. cites fragments of the Preaching of Peter. 345. Obfervation on the Hypotyposes of Clemens, &c. 370. n. that book not his, 373. the citation of it by Theodotus examined, 375. CLEMENS ROMANUS, contemporary with St. Paul, his teftimony of St. Paul's firft Epistle to the Corinthians, contrary to the opinions of many modern learned men, 138. CLEOBIUS, author of several Apocryphal books, 39. LE CLERC, Mr. his opinion of feveral Epiftles of St. Paul, not extant, and fanguine remark, on thofe that are, examined, 136. His fentiments of the Egyptian Gofpel, 203. cenfure of Dr. Grabe, 208, n. His opinion the fame with Dr. Whitby's concerning the Nazarene Gospel, 288, n. COLLINS, Dr. was of opinion that St. Paul wrote an Epistle to the Corinthians, previous to thofe two extant, 137, n. CONSTANTINE Emperor, cites a Greek acroftick concerning Chrift, 364, n. CORINTHIANS, a fpurious Epiftle of theirs to Paul, and another of Paul to them, 144, 145. COSIN, Dr. a miftake of his rectified, 56. CYPRIAN, Apocryphal books mentioned by him, 32. his account of the Christian meetings, 67. CYRIL, Apocryphal books mentioned by him, 33. his Catalogue of Canonical books, 61. inftruc tions to his catechumen concern- D DAILLE, Monf. demonstrates the DOCETE, a branch of the Gnof- n. 414, 419. DRUSIUS, his proof of the Doxology, &c. 116. his opinion of the fuppofed loft pieces of Paul, 136, 137, n. Du PIN, Mr. the only person who has purpofely written on the Canon of the New Teftament, 17. defects in his performance, ibid. his mistake about the word Eucharift, 114, n. another concerning the time of the Syriack Version, ibid. his cenfure of the Egyptian Gofpel, 202, n. of the Gospel of Eve; and a mistake of his, 224, n. his fentiments of the Nazarene, or Hebrew Gofpel, 285, n. his opinion of the Anabaticon and Révelation of Paul, 390, n. a mistake of his concerning Philip's Gospel rectified, 383. E EBIONITES, what part of the New Teftament they rejected, 8. the Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles made ufe of by them, 120. not extant, ibid. feems to have been a different name of the Hebrew Gofpel of Matthew, 126, 217. their Apocryphal Acts, 220. their Gofpel the fame with the Nazarenes, &c. 221. They used the Acts of Peter, 326, n. efteemed St. Paul their great e nemy, 360. they and the Nazarenes always declared Hereticks by the Catholick Church, ibid. EGYPTIANS, their Apocryphal Gospel not extant, 120. teftimonies of the antients and fragments of it, 197. fentiments of modern writers concerning it, 201. five arguments proving it Apocryphal, 204. it was never cited, nor appealed to, by Clemens, 206. but utterly rejected by him, 207. compofed by early Hereticks, and probably Egyptians, 209, 216. Their Therapeutæ bore a great agreement with the Effenes, 213. ELXAI, or ELXEUS, a falfe prophet about the time of Trajan, A. C. 114. founder of the fect of the Helkefaites, &c. 225. ENCRATITES, Apocryphal Gofpel of, not extant, 120. efteemed the fpurious Acts of Andrew above above all other Scriptures, and n. ESSENES, the great agreement be- tween them and the Egyptian EUCHARIST, in what fenfe the EVE, Apocryphal Gospel of, not extant, 120. has been observed 224. EUSEBIUS, his account of several EZRA fettled the Canon of the F FABRICIUS, Mr. obferves that in of his concerning the traditions of Matthias rectified, 259, n. his nice diftinction between the contents of those traditions and a Golpel, 260. he cenfures Mr. Toland, and condemns the Gofpel of the Nazarenes, 288, n. his mistake in fuppofing the Anabaticon and Paul's Revelation to be different books, 319, n. produces a large fragment of Philip's Acts, 381, n. his observation on the Orthodoxographa, 390, n. mistake concerning the Acts of Thomas, 395, n. another concerning the citations of the Fathers of the first century, 410, n. FULLER, his obfervation on the affinity of the Chaldee and Syriac languages, 95, n. G GELASIUS,Apocryphal books mentioned by him, 36. his cenfure of the Acts of Andrew, 150, n. famous decree concerning Apocryphal books, 154, n. thought to have been formed at Rome, A. C. 494. though fome afcribe it to Damafus, and others to Hormifdas; whence Baluzius conjectures it to have been begun by Damafus, renewed by Gelafius, and continued by Hormifdas, 1 56. He cenfures the book of Leucius for Apocryphal, 244, n. and the Golpel of Matthias for the fame, 254. Mentions the Acts of Thecla and Paul, 313, n. condemns their Revelation as Apocryphal, 318, n. rejects the books under the name of Peter, called the books of Clemens, as Apocryphal, 326, n. as alfo the Gofpel under the fame name, 331, n. mentions the Revelation of Stephen as fuch, 386. does the like by the Acts of Thomas, his Gofpel, and Revelation, 395, n, 398, n. 399, n. GNOSTICS, forge the Gospel of Perfection, 380, n. a forgery of theirs mentioned by Irenæus, concerning Christ, 432. GOSPELS, had not the prefent titles prefixed to them by their authors, 173, n. GRABE, Dr. produces a fuppofed fragment of the Gospel of Barnabas out of an old MS. in the Bodleian library, 161, n. but gives no reafon in fupport of his conjecture concerning it, 162. his error concerning the Revelation of St. John and Cerinthus, 183, n. Opinion of the Gospel of the Egyptians, 202, n. his too fond opinion of Apocryphal books, 208. A iniftake of his in fuppofing the Gospel of Matthias to be the fame with the traditions, 255, n. 259. His collection of the fragments of Matthias's Gofpel, 215. of the Gospel of the Nazarenes or Hebrews, 271, n. his fentiments of the latter, 285, n. a mistake of his concerning Hegefippus, 296, n. another concerning Origen, 298. an abfurdity of his in fuppofing the Nazarene to be previous to St. Matthew's Gofpel, 307. His Acts of Paul and Thecla taken out of a MS. in the Bodleian library, 313, n. His diftinction between the Acts of Paul and Thecla, and the Acts of Paul only, 314. an error of his rectified, ibid. allother concerning the Anabaticon and Revelation of Paul, 319. His account of a MS. now extant in Merton College, intitled, The Revelation of Paul, 324, n. His conjecture concerning the judgment of Peter, rectified, 338. too great opinion of the Preaching of Peter, 356, n. he would have Peter's Revelation equally orthodox with that of John, 372, n. wrongfully charges Eufebius with felf-contradiction, 376, n. his falfe conclufion from a paffage out of Sozomen of the Revelation of Peter, 378, n. He fuppofes Peter's Revelation to be a prophecy concerning the state of the Jews and the Chriftian Church, ibid. n. GREEK |