Argumentation in Practice
Since the late 1950s the study of argumentation has developed from a marginal part of logic and rhetoric into a genuine interdisciplinary academic discipline. After having first been primarily concerned with creating an adequate philosophical perspective on argumentation, argumentation theorists have gradually shifted their focus of attention to a more immediate concern with the ins and outs of argumentative praxis. What exactly are the characteristics of situated argumentative discourse in different argumentative action types ? How is the discourse influenced by institutional and contextual constraints? In what way can prominent cases of argumentative discourse be fruitfully analysed? Argumentation in Practice aims to provide insight into some important facets of argumentative praxis and the different ways in which it can be approached. The first part of this volume, Conceptions of problems in argumentative practice , introduces useful theoretical perspectives. The second part, Empirical studies of argumentative practice , contains both empirical studies of a general kind and several types of specific case studies.
Què en diuen els usuaris - Escriviu una ressenya
No hem trobat cap ressenya als llocs habituals.
Competing demands multiple ideals and the structure of argumentation practices
Arguments of victims
Coductive and abductive foundations for sentimental arguments in politics
Reparations or separation?
Aesthetic arguments and civil society
The use of arguments from perceived opposition in US terrorism policy
How could official speakers communicate reasonably with their king?
On the pragmatics of argumentative discourse
From argument analysis to cultural keywords and back again
Empirical studies of argumentative practice
The accusation of amalgame as a metaargumentative refutation
Constructing the imagined antagonist in advertising argumentation
Altres edicions - Mostra-ho tot
accusation of amalgame ad hominem advertising African Americans American analysis antagonist arguers arguing argumentation theory argumentative discourse argumentative practice arguments from perceived audience Bill Nye British communication concept conﬂict construction context controversy critical discussion David Horowitz debate deﬁned deﬁnition dialectical dialogue difﬁculties dissociation domain domain of discourse Eemeren Ellen emotional endoxa energy Epcot evaluation example expressed ExxonMobil fact fallacy ﬁgures ﬁles ﬁlm ﬁnal ﬁnd ﬁrst genre Grootendorst Guildford Four gumentation Hample ideal identiﬁed inﬂuence interaction inventional capacity issue Joseon dynasty jurors logical Maguire Seven McVeigh meaning ment moves Muslims National Nightline normative Ofﬁce ofﬁcials opinion participants perceived opposition perspective persuasive political pragma-dialectical pragmatic premises Press printers problem reason reﬂect reparations reparations for slavery response rhetorical role scientiﬁc semantic signiﬁcant speakers speciﬁc speech standpoint strategy study of argumentation sufﬁcient televised term terrorism thesis tion trial tu quoque Umrah University utterances victims words