Imatges de pàgina
PDF
EPUB

brethren, to come from ignorant persons who did not understand even the grounds of their dissent from the Established Church. Indeed, he had always supposed that Protestant Dissenters would be the last persons in the country who would wish to see severe punishments, or exclusions, enforced on account of religious opinions; and he concurred with the petitioners in thinking that the cause of religion was injured by such laws.

MAY 6.

A PETITION against the Catholic claims was presented by the Bishop of BATH and WELLS, from the Protestant Dissenters of Ebenezer Chapel, in the parish of St. Mary, Marlborough. In presenting the petition, the Bishop observed, that it was one which he had great pleasure in submitting to their lordships. It expressed the sentiments of a most respectable body of Dissenters, and the manner in which they spoke of the Establishment did great honour to the church and to them. The petition was remarkable for its good sense; but there were two points which he wished to notice-first, that there was a number of females among the petitioners; and secondly, that several of the names were not in the hand writing of the petitioners. He had asked the reason of so many names appearing in one hand, and was informed that it was a usual practice in the congregation for the deacon to sign the names of other persons, they being present and authorizing the signature. If there should be any objection to the petition on this account, he would present it as merely the petition of the persons who had signed

it. He wished the petition to be read at length, as the opinions it contained did honour to those from whom it came; and it was one of the best petitions in sentiment and language he ever had the honour to present in that house.

Lord KING had listened attentively to the reading of the petition, and thought the right reverend prelate must be rather singular as to his ideas of good sense, when he praised this petition so much. There appeared to be very little sense in it, and the little it contained was buried under a mass of words. He had a petition to present of a different purport. It came from the Unitarians of the town of Taunton. It expressed the sentiments of a numerous and respectable, and, what was more, a very honest body of Dissenters. Perhaps the presenting of it would give an opportunity for something to be said in the manner of a redoubtable doctor of Dublin, who fired off a double battery against the Catholics for believing too much, and the Unitarians for believng too little. The noble lord then pre

sented the petition, which was in favour of the Catholic claims.

The Bishop of BATH and WELLS and Lord KING interchanged a few words, which were not distinctly heard below the bar.

MAY 13.

The Marquis of LANSDOWN held in his hand petitions in favour of the Catholic Relief Bill now before the house, from Bridport, Plympton, and from the Dissenters of Chichester. With regard to the first of these, he stated, that he had been instructed to say that it would not have been presented had not a petition of a different tendency been got up signatures to the present petition were, however, far more numerous than those attached to that which opposed the bill.

The

Lord HOLLAND presented a petition to the same effect froin Stroud, in Gloucestershire. The petitioners were Dissenters, and the petition had been drawn up in consequence of a false notion having gone forth, that persons of the religious persuasion of the petitioners were hostile to the Catholic claims.

The Noble Lord also presented a petition in favour of the Catholics from New Ross, and from the ministers and elders of the Presbyterian Dissenters of Down and Antrim. The petitioners, in contradiction to the reports that the Presbyterians of the North of Ireland were unfavourable to the Catholic Claims, stated, that to the best of their belief the great body of Dissenters still adhered to the resolution which had been come to on that subject some years ago by the Synod of Ulster.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.
MAY 5.

Mr. DENMAN rose to present a petition, which, though signed by only three individuals, inhabitants of Derby, was every way worthy the attention of the House, since those individuals were of the highest respectability, and professed the most liberal principles. He believed the Honourable Member for Derbyshire would feel no hesitation in bearing testimony to the respectability of the parties who felt it their duty to approach the House on this occasion. They were respectively the ministers of congregations of the Presbyterian, Baptist and Independent deuomination, and their reason for petitioning the House was, because they had heard that a petition had been presented to Parliament on behalf of certain persons calling themselves Protestant Dissenters, of Derby, against the Bill for the relief of Roman Catholics,— a proceeding which they held to be not only illiberal in itself, but perfectly in

consistent with the doctrine on which the Protestant Dissenters acted. The petitioners were of opinion that liberty of conscience was a principle, sacred, universal and inalienable; and they held that any restraints placed upon it, either by pains or penalties, or by exclusion from civil situations, were acts of opIn conclusion, pression and wrong.

they called on the House to grant to the Roman Catholics the relief which they prayed for.

Lord G. CAVENDISH (we believe) bore testimony to the great respectability of the petitioners.

Case of Richard Carlile.

JUNE 2.

Mr. BROUGHAM presented a petition from Richard Carlile, and six other individuals, whose names he mentioned. The petitioners stated, that they had been prosecuted, and were immured in different prisons of the country, for not being Christians according to the forms of the Established Church, and for stating their reasons why they were not so; and they prayed that the House would rescind the various sentences which had been passed against them, and admit them to the same toleration that was enjoyed by other Dissenters. No one who knew would suppose him (Mr. Brougham) that he was inclined to patronize any species of indecent ribaldry against the institutions of the country. He considered such ribaldry to be a crime in itself, and to be the very worst mode which could be adopted to propagate any kind of opinions. For, suppose the party who held such opinions to be right, and the rest of the country to be in the wrong, the expression of them in ribald or indecent language, was calculated to affrout the feelings and rouse the indig. nation of those whom he ought to conciliate rather than offend, if he wished to He therefore make them proselytes. said, that if these petitioners were right, the most unwise step they could take for the extension of their doctrines, would be to attack the received doctrines of the country in low and scurrilous language. At the same time he thought that the law ought not to press too heavily upon them because they appeared to be, in a certain degree, enthusiasts and fanatics; and toleration, as well as expediency, required, that they should not be subjected to that degree of punishment which would entitle them to be considered, either by themselves or by others, as martyrs to the principles, such as they were, that they professed. If they had taken a bad way to attack the religion of the country, it was incumbent upon us not to take a bad way to defend

it; and the worst of all possible ways
would be to inflict severer punishment
Having
than their offences required.
thus endeavoured to guard himself against
misconstruction, he would say, that he
could conceive no harm as likely to
accrue to religion from fair and free
discussion; and that until the mode of
discussion became so offensive as to ex-
the feelings of almost every
cite against
man in the country, prosecutions for
blasphemy were among the very worst
methods of defending religion. That was
his deliberate and sincere opinion; and
he could hardly conceive any instance
in which toleration could be carried too
far, either to the religion professed, or
to the persons professing it. He moved
that this petition be brought up.

Mr. PEEL made several observations,
but in a tone of voice which was almost
inaudible in the gallery. He was under-
stood to concur with Mr. Brougham that
prosecutions should not be instituted on
the score of religious opinions, so long
as those opinions were expressed in fair
and temperate language: but he con-
tended, that as soon as they vented them-
selves in scurrilous attacks on established
institutions, they deserved the attention
of the civil authorities. He maintained,
that the libels published by Carlile and
his fellow-petitioners were of the de-
scription mentioned by the hon. member
for Winchelsea: they were revolting to
the feelings of every moral man in the
country, and were therefore properly
selected for prosecution. He did not see
how Mr. Richard Carlile could be well
held up as an object of mercy to the
Crown. So far from expressing any con-
trition for the offence he had committed,
he gloried in it, and not only boasted that
he would continue to repeat it, but ae-
tually carried his boast into execution.
To his sister, Miss Carlile, the mercy of
the Crown had been extended; and she
had shown herself not undeserving of it,
by refusing to participate any further in
the blasphemous publications of her
brother.

Sir F. BURDETT protested against the principle laid down by the Right Hon. Secretary, that a man who was suffering punishment for religious opinions, should not be entitled to any mitigation of it, unless he turned hypocrite, and retracted the opinions he believed to be true.

Mr. MONCK ridiculed the idea of defending religion by prosecuting blasphemy. There was no law in America against blasphemy, and yet he believed that no country in the world was more free from what was generally called blasphemous publications.

Mr. PEEL made an obscrvation which was inaudible in the gallery.

Sir F. BURDETT contended, that upon the principles laid down by his learned friend below him, and agreed to by the Right Hon. Secretary opposite, all prosecutions for religious opinions were inexpedient. It was agreed on all hands that religious opinions ought to be tolerated so long as they were expressed in temperate language; but it was now argued, that as soon as those opinions were so expressed as to disgust every honest mind, then they ought to be visited with punishment. It appeared to him, that under such circumstances they ought not to be noticed, because, if they were so poisonous as was represented, they carried along with them their own antidote. (Hear!) It was his opinion, that if Mr. Carlile had been left to him self, and had not been prosecuted by the Government, he would at this moment have been totally unheard of; whereas by prosecuting him, the Government had given him a notoriety which he could not otherwise have acquired, and had got themselves into a scrape from which they found some difliculty in getting extricated. He thought that the infliction of great severity on any man for his opinions, no matter how offensive they might be, was the most certain way not to wean him from, but to confirm him in, those obnoxious opinions.

Mr. W. SMITH and Lord BINNING Severally made a few observations-the one in favour, the other in condemnation of the prayer of the petition.

The petition was then laid upon the table.

Mr. BROUGHAM, in moving that it be printed, said, that he would take that opportunity of stating a fact which he had forgotten to state in presenting the petition. So far was the punishment inflicted on these petitioners from having put down publications of this obnoxious character, that if he was rightly informed, they were now sold openly in all parts of the town. (Hear.) It had been said, that if the discussion of religious truths were calmly conducted, it ought to be permitted. A wonderful admission truly! Why, where would be the use of the discussion of religion, if the argument was to be all on one side? (Hear.) He theu pointed out the glaring inconsistency of denying to the poor the right of reading any discussion upon the truths of Chris. tianity, and of allowing to the rich the privilege of having in their libraries the works of Gibbon, and all such writers.

Mr. HUME wished the Right Hon. Secretary opposite would answer him one question-Was not this country the only country in Europe where individuals were at present imprisoned for religious opinions? He recollected the time when

this country was filled with gladness and rejoicings because the inquisition was abolished in every country in Europe; but if our prisons continued to be filled as they were at present, with individuals suffering for religious opinions, England would succeed to the vacant post of inquisitor-general for Europe, than which he could conceive nothing more derogatory to its interests and honour. (Hear.)

Mr. PEEL declared it was quite ridiculous to talk of the prisons of the country being filled with sufferers for religious opinions, when it was notorious that there were not more than eleven persons confined for blasphemous publications; and of that number only five had been prosecuted since his accession to his present office. (Hear!)

The ATTORNEY-GENERAL defended the course which had been pursued by the law-officers of the Crown with regard to these petitioners. He contended that the prosecutions which had been instituted against them had been effectual in suppressing blasphemous publications, and argued that it was unfair to blame mimisters for keeping them in prison, when they were consigned to it by a sentence of the Court of King's Bench, arising out of those prosecutions. They were most of them imprisoned for selling Palmer's Principles of Nature, and he would say that a more horrible, blasphemous, and scurrilous libel, than that work, had never issued from the press of any country. The juries who had tried these petitioners were not more shocked by the work itself, thau by the manner in which the parties had ventured to defend it.

Mr. BROUGHAM did not blame the law-officers of the Crown for prosecuting these individuals, but rather for leaving them unprosecuted, till their offences had risen to such a height as to be thought fit ground for altering the old statute law of the country. He did not blame them for prosecuting Mr. Carlile; but he did blame them for bringing down six new acts upon the country, without trying the efficacy of those which previously were in existence. (Hear!) Long before those acts were passed, Benbow had kindly offered the throats of several individuals to the knife. Why had he escaped prosecution? If any man deserved prosecu tion it was that individual; but the Go. vernment abstained from indicting him and others, who were equally culpable with him, in order that they might repeat their offences, and so afford a pretext for innovating upon the constitution. (Hear!) It had been said that prosecutions were not instituted because juries would not convict. He had always said, that, though juries might not be inclined to convict for libels against the Govern

ment, they would be ready enough to convict for libels inciting to assassination. With regard to Palmer's Principles of Nature, a work which he had never read, he would undertake to say that it was not half so bad as any publication of either Hume or Gibbon. Voltaire's works were full of ribaldry and indecency, and yet he had never heard that they had been prosecuted for corrupting the morals

of the ladies and gentlemen at the west end of the town. (A laugh). If works of this description were to be prosecuted, he thought that the prosecutious should be directed to the works read by the rich, instead of being confined, as they now were, to works read exclusively by the poor.

The petition was then ordered to be printed.

NEW PUBLICATIONS IN THEOLOGY AND GENERAL LITERATURE.

[blocks in formation]

Chronology of the Kings of England, in Verse. (With a Plate of each of the Kings of England.) By the Rev. Edmund Butcher. 2s.

A Manual of Classical Bibliography, comprising a Copious Detail of the various Editions, Translations into the English and other Languages, Commentaries and Works illustrative of the Greek and Roman Classics. By Jos. Wm. Moss, B. A., of Magdalen Hall, Oxford. 2 Vols. 8vo. 17. 10s.

The History of Chivalry, or Knight hood and its Times. By Charles Mills, Esq. 2 Vols. 8vo. Vignette Titles. 17.

4s.

An Essay on the Authenticity of Ossian's Poems. By Donald Campbell, Lientenant on the Half-pay of the 57th Regt. 28.

On the Nobility of the British Gentry, or the Political Ranks and Dignities of the British Empire, compared with those on the Continent. By Sir James Laurence, Knight of Malta. Second Edition, enlarged. 78. 6d.

The Literary Life of Dr. Y. L. Villanueva; or, Memoirs of his Writings and Opinions. Written by Himself. With an Appendix of Fifty-nine Spanish Documents relative to the Secret History of the Council of Trent. 2 Vols. 8vo.

Sketches of Corsica; or, a Journal Written during a Visit to that Island in 1823, with an Outline of its History, and Specimens of the Language and Poetry of the People. By Robert Benson, M.A. F. L. S. 8vo. Five Plates. 10s. 6d.

Wanderings in South America, the North West of the United States and the

Antilles, from the Year 1812 to 1825. By Charles Waterton, Esq., of Walton Hall, Wakefield. 4to. 14. 11s. 6d.

Characters omitted in Crabbe's Parish Register; with other Tales. By Alexander Balfour, Author of "Contemplation." 12mo. 78.

Legends of the North; or, the Feudal Christmas. A Poem. By Mrs. Henry Rolls, Authoress of the Home of Love, &c. 8vo. 98.

Effusions of Love from Chatelar to Mary Queen of Scots, Translated from a Gaelic Manuscript in the Scotch College at Paris, and interspersed with Songs, Sonnets, and Notes Explanatory. By the Translator. Foolscap 8vo. 6s.

Thoughts on an Illustrious Exile; occasioned by the Prosecution of the Protestants in 1815, with other Poems. By Hugh Stuart Boyd, Esq. 8vo. 3s. 6d.

A Father's Love and a Woman's Friendship. By H. R. Mosse. 5 Vols.

17. 10s.

The Rising Village, a Poem. By Oliver Goldsmith, a Descendant of the Family of the Author of the "Deserted Village.' 2s. 6d.

The Travellers; a Tale, illustrative of the Manners, Customs and Superstitions of Modern Greece. By T. T. C. Kendrick. 3 Vols. 12mo. 18s.

Matilda, a Tale of the Day. Post 8vo. 10s. 6d.

The Moor, a Poem. By Lord Porchester. 8vo. 14s.

A Minstrel's Hours of Song, in Poems. By Agnes Mahoney. 12mo. 78. 6d.

The Complete Servant; being an Exposition of the Duties and Daily Business of every Description of Male and Female Servants, with Laws relative to Masters and Servants, Tables, &c. By Samuel and Sarah Adams, Fifty Years Servants in various Families. 12mo. 78. 6d.

Labour Defended against the Claims of Capital; or the Unproductiveness of Capital proved, with Reference to the present Combinations amongst Workmen. By a Labourer. 1s.

A Series of Tables, in which the Weights and Measures of France are reduced to the English Standard. Ry the late C. K. Sanders. 8vo. 78. 6d. Boards, or 8s. 6d. Half-bound.

Notes to Assist the Memory, in various Sciences. Foolscap 8vo. 58. 6d.

The Art of Improving the Voice and Ear, and of increasing their Musical Powers, on Philosophical Principles. Post Svo. 88.

The State of the Jews in the Beginning of the 19th Century. Translated from the Dutch of M. Paul Van Hermert, by Lewis Jackson. Svo. 2s. 6d.

Quarterly Theological Review and Ecclesiastical Record. Vol. I. 8vo. 12s. Remains of the Venerable Missionary Swartz, consisting of Letters and Journals, never before published in this Country. 8s.

The Advancement of Society in Knowledge and Religion. By James Douglas, Esq. 8vo. 88.

The Christian Religion made Plain, in a Dissuasive from Methodism: with an Appendix, on the Probability of Punishment being Corrective, the Trinity, &c. By Richard Boucher, Rector of Bright Waltham, Berks. 8vo. Second Edition. 6s. 6d.

A Reply to the "Letter of the Rev. J. Birt, of Manchester, to Dr. Wardlaw, on certain Passages of his Dissertation on Infant Baptism." By Ralph Wardlaw, D.D. 8vo. 1s.

Bible Society.

The Turkish New Testament incapable of Defence, and the True Principles of Biblical Translation Vindicated, in Answer to Professor Lee's Remarks on Dr.

Henderson's Appeal. By the Author of the Appeal.

Roman Catholics.

The Claims of the Church of Rome Examined and Confuted, in Two Sermons. By T. Raven, B. A., Minister of Trinity Chapel, Preston. 2s.

Popery Unmasked, being an Answer to T. Baddeley's "Sure Way." By James Richardson, M. A., one of the Vicars Choral of York.

Sermons.

Preached on several Occasions, in the Island of Barbadoes. By W. J. Shrews

bury, late Wesleyan Methodist Missionary in that Island. 8vo. 5s. 6d.

Lectures on the Epistles to the Seven Churches of Asia. By J. Wadsworth. 6s. 6d.

Single.

Preached in All Saints' Church, Northampton, June 16, 1825, before the Northampton Committees in Aid of the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. By Herbert, Lord Bishop of Peterborough. 8vo. 1s. 6d.

A Charge at the Primary Visitation of the Diocese of Gloucester, June and-July, 1825. By Christopher, Bishop of Glou cester. 4to. 2s. 6d.

Christian Sympathy: preached to the Congregation of English Protestants in the City of Rome, ou Easter Sunday, April 3, 1825, on Occasion of a Collection for the Benefit of the Vaudois or Waldenses in Piedmont. By J. H. Hobart, D. D. 8vo. 1s. 6d.

Preached in Lambeth Chapel, July 24, 1825, at the Consecration of the Right Rev. John Banks, D. D., Lord Bishop of St. David's. By George Chandler, LL.D., Rector of All-Souls, St. Mary-le-Bone, &c. 28.

"What is Education?" Preached before the Society for Educating the Poor of Newfoundland. By Henry Budd, M. A., Chaplain of Bridewell Hospital. 1s. 6d.

Attempt to Demonstrate the Catholicism of the Church of England, preached in the Episcopal Chapel at Stirling, March 20, 1825, at the Consecration of the Right Rev. M. H. Luscombe, LL D. With Notes. By W. F. Hook, M. A., Curate of Whippingham, in the Isle of Wight. 4to. 2s. 6d.

The Doctrine of the Trinity proved: preached by J. Beckworth, A. M., Vicar of Dewsbury. Is.

On Apostolic Doctrine and Fellowship, preached in the Parish Church of Buckingham, at the Triennial Visitation of the Bishop of Lincoln. By J. Hill, A. M. 4to. 28.

Preached at the Triennial Visitation of the Hon. and Right Rev. George Pelham, Bishop of Lincoln. By J. T. Huntley, A. M. F. L. S. 8vo. is. 6d.

A Charge to the Clergy of the Archdeaconry of Sarum, 1825. By Charles Daubeny, LL.D. 8vo. 1s. 6d.

CORRESPONDENCE.

Communications have been received from Messrs. Johns; and Tarner; A Berean; J. E. R.; J. F.; and T. C. A.

Our grave correspondent might have seen that by putting the word "Anabaptist" (p. 451) within inverted commas, the writer meant to point out the word as a quotation.

A packet has been received from our American Correspondent, who, it is hoped, will receive a letter from the Editor before he reads this acknowledgment.

« AnteriorContinua »